jiantw83andClaude Opus 5
b78f7e8b3f
What：依 jsc-meta:skill-check 的稽核結果修正技能與工具——補上每個步驟的可檢核完成條件、 把留在內文的標準輸入輸出流程下放 tools/、修正查表與退碼路由造成的誤判。 Why：稽核發現這些缺失會讓技能在實際執行時走錯分支或靜默通過。 完成條件缺漏是最常被違反的一項；退碼誤判與查表錯誤則會讓良性狀況被當成失敗。 How：逐項對照 references/guidelines.md 的審核檢查清單修正，新增的工具都有 documented exit codes，並以真實執行驗證每條路徑。 Who：jsc-meta:skill-check 例行稽核（2026-08-25）。 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
37 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown
37 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: plan
|
|
description: SDLC planning stage. Gate on capability tags enforced in code by sdlc-gate (plan requires reasoning-max, verified against the transcript's actual model id), pick or create a plan from PLAN_CONTENTS, then run a decision tree until goal, scope, and feasibility reach consensus. Produce user stories into wiki page PLAN_{HASH}. Logic only - never write code or modify files. Use when the user wants to start or refine a plan; not for analysis or implementation.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# plan
|
|
|
|
Goal: create or extend the wiki plan page `PLAN_{HASH}`.
|
|
This skill is a **logic-only** stage: never output code, and **never modify any file**.
|
|
|
|
`{HASH}` = the shared wiki hash for `{owner}/{repo}` used to build the `PLAN_{HASH}` page name, computed by `jsc-gitea/tools/hash-id` (see `jsc-gitea:wiki`).
|
|
All wiki reads and writes go through `jsc-gitea:wiki`.
|
|
|
|
## Steps
|
|
|
|
1. **Model gate and stage lock** — run `jsc-cli/tools/model-tags.sh sync`, then `jsc-hooks/hooks/sdlc-gate.sh lock plan`. This stage requires the `reasoning-max` capability tag. Rules: `references/model-gate.md`. Completion condition: the script exited 0, and you have reported the stage, the required tag, the actual model id it read from the transcript, and the verdict.
|
|
2. Read `PLAN_CONTENTS` via `jsc-gitea:wiki` and list the plans whose status is the literal 「未分析」 (not analyzed), with names and HASH. Completion condition: you have listed every 未分析 plan with its name and HASH, or reported that none exists.
|
|
3. Let the user choose per `jsc-ask:ask` rules: **extend an existing plan** (list the not-analyzed plans as options) or **create a new plan**. State the impact scope on every option. Completion condition: the user has picked one option explicitly, and you have named the `PLAN_{HASH}` page this run writes to.
|
|
4. **Keep questioning until consensus** — rules in `references/consensus.md`, which is the single authority for both planning and analysis. Cover all three items:
|
|
- Goal: the problem to solve and the criteria for success.
|
|
- Scope: what is included, what is excluded, which repositories are involved.
|
|
- Feasibility: whether the system architecture and data sources support the goal.
|
|
|
|
**One round is never enough**: every answer must produce the next question, derived from what that answer just exposed. Never fill a gap with your own assumption, and never move on to user stories while any item is still open.
|
|
|
|
Completion condition: all three items are settled under both conditions of `references/consensus.md` — no remaining unknown that would change the output, **and** the user's explicit confirmation of the summary you read back.
|
|
5. Turn the consensus into **user stories** (the zh-TW pattern 「身為⋯⋯我想要⋯⋯以便⋯⋯」), one per line. Completion condition: every consensus item is covered by at least one user story in that pattern, and no user story rests on an unanswered question.
|
|
6. Apply `templates/plan-page.md` to create or update the plan page, and write it back via `jsc-gitea:wiki`. The page content is Traditional Chinese, exactly as the template dictates. Completion condition: the page is saved on the wiki and carries every section the template dictates — goal, scope, feasibility, user stories and the consensus summary — with no placeholder left unfilled.
|
|
7. If the plan page is new, add it to `PLAN_CONTENTS` using the entry format of `templates/plan-contents.md`, with status set to the literal 「未分析」. Completion condition: `PLAN_CONTENTS` shows the plan's row with the literal 「未分析」, saved on the wiki.
|
|
|
|
## Hard limits
|
|
|
|
- Never output a code snippet.
|
|
- Never modify any file in the working directory.
|
|
- Never skip the decision tree and assume requirements.
|
|
- Never stop questioning after one round; consensus is reached only under `references/consensus.md`, and the user says so.
|