.claude-plugin/plugin.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "jsc-sdlc",
-  "version": "0.1.1",
+  "version": "0.1.2",
   "description": "開發生命週期：規劃/分析/實作/維護（wiki 追蹤）",
   "skills": "./skills",
   "author": {

.codex-plugin/plugin.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "jsc-sdlc",
-  "version": "0.1.1",
+  "version": "0.1.2",
   "description": "開發生命週期：規劃/分析/實作/維護（wiki 追蹤）",
   "skills": "./skills"
 }

README.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # jsc-sdlc — 開發生命週期
 
-jsc 技能組的 sdlc domain：規劃 → 分析 → 實作 → 維護四個階段，全程以 wiki 頁追蹤（`PLAN_CONTENTS`、`PLAN_{HASH}`、`ANALYZE_CONTENTS`、`ANALYZE_{HASH}`、`REPO_CONTENTS`、`REPO_{HASH}`、`DELIVER_CONTENTS`、`DELIVER_{HASH}`、`MAINTAIN_CONTENTS`）。工作包完成即交付：實作階段會詢問交付文件要產生成 `DELIVER_{HASH}` wiki 頁或 Gitea 議題留言。另有異常頁（`ERROR_CONTENTS`、`ERROR_{HASH}`）記錄 hook 或流程失敗。每次切換階段先過模型閘門：由 `jsc-hooks/hooks/sdlc-gate.sh lock {stage}` 從 transcript 讀出**實際**模型 id，比對該階段的必要能力標籤（plan、analyze 需 `reasoning-max`；implement 需 `coding`；maintain 任意），不符就拒絕上鎖、該階段不得執行。判定全在程式層，模型不得自評標籤。通過後鎖定到下一階段的閘門重新上鎖；同一階段內把模型換成不合格的，下一輪提示會被 hook 以 exit 2 擋下。分析前先與使用者確認來源分支；實作沿用同一條來源分支作為 worktree 基準與 PR 目標。**所有參考與來源分支一律取遠端的 `origin/{分支}`，動作前先 `git fetch --prune origin`；本地分支不可作為基準，本地與遠端不一致就停下回報。**
+jsc 技能組的 sdlc domain：規劃 → 分析 → 實作 → 維護四個階段，全程以 wiki 頁追蹤（`PLAN_CONTENTS`、`PLAN_{HASH}`、`ANALYZE_CONTENTS`、`ANALYZE_{HASH}`、`REPO_CONTENTS`、`REPO_{HASH}`、`DELIVER_CONTENTS`、`DELIVER_{HASH}`、`MAINTAIN_CONTENTS`）。工作包完成即交付：實作階段會詢問交付文件要產生成 `DELIVER_{HASH}` wiki 頁或 Gitea 議題留言。另有異常頁（`ERROR_CONTENTS`、`ERROR_{HASH}`）記錄 hook 或流程失敗。每次切換階段先過模型閘門：由 `jsc-hooks/hooks/sdlc-gate.sh lock {stage}` 從 transcript 讀出**實際**模型 id，比對該階段的必要能力標籤（plan、analyze 需 `reasoning-max`；implement 需 `coding`；maintain 任意），不符就拒絕上鎖、該階段不得執行。判定全在程式層，模型不得自評標籤，且**每次都要把閘門結果回報使用者**（階段、必要標籤、實際模型、判定），不論通過或阻擋。通過後鎖定到下一階段的閘門重新上鎖；同一階段內把模型換成不合格的，下一輪提示會被 hook 以 exit 2 擋下。分析前先與使用者確認來源分支；實作沿用同一條來源分支作為 worktree 基準與 PR 目標。**所有參考與來源分支一律取遠端的 `origin/{分支}`，動作前先 `git fetch --prune origin`；本地分支不可作為基準，本地與遠端不一致就停下回報。**
 
 ## 安裝、更新、移除
 

plugin.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "jsc-sdlc",
-  "version": "0.1.1",
+  "version": "0.1.2",
   "description": "開發生命週期：規劃/分析/實作/維護（wiki 追蹤）",
   "skills": "./skills/"
 }

skills/analyze/SKILL.md

@@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ All wiki reads and writes go through `jsc-gitea:wiki`.
    1. Run `jsc-cli/tools/model-tags.sh sync` to refresh `$JSC_HOME/model-tags.tsv` from `jsc-cli/references/model-tags.md`.
    2. Run `jsc-hooks/hooks/sdlc-gate.sh lock analyze`. The script reads the **actual** model id from the transcript, compares it against this stage's required tags (`reasoning-max`), and locks the stage only when they match.
    3. **Never claim a capability tag you have not verified with that script**, and never substitute your own judgement for its verdict. Non-zero exit = blocked: relay the script's message verbatim, stop the skill, do nothing else this turn. Do not run `unlock` to get past the gate; only the user may decide that.
-   4. Exit 0 means the stage is locked. From now until the next stage's gate runs, the sdlc-gate hook blocks every prompt whose model stops satisfying the tags.
+   4. **Report the gate result to the user every time — whether it passed or blocked.** State the stage, the required tags, the actual model id the script read from the transcript, and the verdict. A silent pass looks identical to a skipped check, and the whole point of moving this into code was that a claimed check cannot be trusted.
+   5. Exit 0 means the stage is locked. From now until the next stage's gate runs, the sdlc-gate hook blocks every prompt whose model stops satisfying the tags.
 2. **Confirm the source branch** — the branch whose code counts as the current state:
    1. Run `git fetch --prune origin` first — without it, every `origin/...` reference is stale cache. Then report the working directory's current branch, the **remote** branches available (`git branch -r`; never `git branch`) and whether the working tree is clean.
    2. Ask per `jsc-ask:ask` rules which branch the analysis reads from; state the impact scope on every option (analysing the wrong branch produces work packages for code that does not exist).

skills/implement/SKILL.md

@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ All wiki reads and writes go through `jsc-gitea:wiki`.
    1. Run `jsc-cli/tools/model-tags.sh sync` to refresh `$JSC_HOME/model-tags.tsv` from `jsc-cli/references/model-tags.md`.
    2. Run `jsc-hooks/hooks/sdlc-gate.sh lock implement`. The script reads the **actual** model id from the transcript, compares it against this stage's required tags (`coding`), and locks the stage only when they match.
    3. **Never claim a capability tag you have not verified with that script**, and never substitute your own judgement for its verdict. Non-zero exit = blocked: relay the script's message verbatim, stop the skill, do nothing else this turn. Do not run `unlock` to get past the gate; only the user may decide that.
-   4. Exit 0 means the stage is locked. From now until the next stage's gate runs, the sdlc-gate hook blocks every prompt whose model stops satisfying the tags.
+   4. **Report the gate result to the user every time — whether it passed or blocked.** State the stage, the required tags, the actual model id the script read from the transcript, and the verdict. A silent pass looks identical to a skipped check, and the whole point of moving this into code was that a claimed check cannot be trusted.
+   5. Exit 0 means the stage is locked. From now until the next stage's gate runs, the sdlc-gate hook blocks every prompt whose model stops satisfying the tags.
 2. **Confirm the source branch — it is also this stage's PR target**:
    1. Run `git fetch --prune origin` first — every `origin/...` reference is stale cache without it. Then read the source branch from the analysis page and report it, along with the current branch and whether the working tree is clean. **Branches are always the remote ones; local branches are never the basis.**
    2. Ask per `jsc-ask:ask` rules to confirm that `origin/{來源分支}` is both the worktree's base and the PR target for every work package in this analysis. State the impact scope: each finished work package merges back into the source branch, and that branch as a whole reaches `develop` later as its own separate PR.

skills/maintain/SKILL.md

@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ All wiki reads and writes go through `jsc-gitea:wiki`.
    1. Run `jsc-cli/tools/model-tags.sh sync` to refresh `$JSC_HOME/model-tags.tsv` from `jsc-cli/references/model-tags.md`.
    2. Run `jsc-hooks/hooks/sdlc-gate.sh lock maintain`. The script reads the **actual** model id from the transcript and checks it against this stage's required tags — maintenance requires no specific tag, so the gate passes as long as the actual model can be determined at all.
    3. **Never claim a capability tag you have not verified with that script**, and never substitute your own judgement for its verdict. Non-zero exit = blocked: relay the script's message verbatim, stop the skill, do nothing else this turn. Do not run `unlock` to get past the gate; only the user may decide that.
-   4. Exit 0 means the stage is locked. Run this gate only when the stage changes; inside the maintenance stage the lock already covers every project, so never re-gate between projects.
+   4. **Report the gate result to the user every time — whether it passed or blocked.** State the stage, the required tags, the actual model id the script read from the transcript, and the verdict. A silent pass looks identical to a skipped check, and the whole point of moving this into code was that a claimed check cannot be trusted.
+   5. Exit 0 means the stage is locked. Run this gate only when the stage changes; inside the maintenance stage the lock already covers every project, so never re-gate between projects.
 2. Read `MAINTAIN_CONTENTS` via `jsc-gitea:wiki` and filter projects **still inside their maintenance window**: start date ≤ today, and (end date is NULL or ≥ today).
 3. Every project **MUST run as a sub agent** with this flow:
    1. Run `git fetch --prune origin`, then switch the project to `develop`, falling back to `master`, and bring it up to `origin/{該分支}` — the remote is the basis, never the local branch. Local and remote diverged → report and skip that project; never `pull --rebase`, `reset` or discard anything on your own.

skills/plan/SKILL.md

@@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ All wiki reads and writes go through `jsc-gitea:wiki`.
    1. Run `jsc-cli/tools/model-tags.sh sync` to refresh `$JSC_HOME/model-tags.tsv` from `jsc-cli/references/model-tags.md`.
    2. Run `jsc-hooks/hooks/sdlc-gate.sh lock plan`. The script reads the **actual** model id from the transcript, compares it against this stage's required tags (`reasoning-max`), and locks the stage only when they match.
    3. **Never claim a capability tag you have not verified with that script**, and never substitute your own judgement for its verdict. Non-zero exit = blocked: relay the script's message verbatim, stop the skill, do nothing else this turn. Do not run `unlock` to get past the gate; only the user may decide that.
-   4. Exit 0 means the stage is locked. From now until the next stage's gate runs, the sdlc-gate hook blocks every prompt whose model stops satisfying the tags.
+   4. **Report the gate result to the user every time — whether it passed or blocked.** State the stage, the required tags, the actual model id the script read from the transcript, and the verdict. A silent pass looks identical to a skipped check, and the whole point of moving this into code was that a claimed check cannot be trusted.
+   5. Exit 0 means the stage is locked. From now until the next stage's gate runs, the sdlc-gate hook blocks every prompt whose model stops satisfying the tags.
 2. Read `PLAN_CONTENTS` via `jsc-gitea:wiki` and list the plans whose status is the literal 「未分析」 (not analyzed), with names and HASH.
 3. Let the user choose per `jsc-ask:ask` rules: **extend an existing plan** (list the not-analyzed plans as options) or **create a new plan**. State the impact scope on every option.
 4. **Keep questioning until consensus** — rules in `references/consensus.md`, which is the single authority for both planning and analysis. Cover all three items: