Files
ai-code-review/.gitea/ai-review/findings/2026-07-20-15:57:46.json
T
Jeffery e0ae6f886f
node-actions/template: CI / BUILD (pull_request) Successful in 5s
CI / TEST (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 28s
CI / TEST (Antigravity) (pull_request) Successful in 52s
CI / TEST (Codex) (pull_request) Successful in 2m58s
chore(ai-review 狀態): 回寫已處理 findings
2026-07-21 13:46:48 +08:00

79 lines
5.0 KiB
JSON
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
{
"generatedAt": "2026/07/20 15:57:46",
"commitSha": "a6534ee0764fe2363ebbb5525586ad3868dc6720",
"prNumber": 6,
"tool": {
"name": "code-review-resolve",
"version": "0.0.8",
"model": "(工具預設)"
},
"findings": [
{
"id": "F003",
"reviewer": "Maya",
"focus": "testing",
"badge": "🧪",
"severity": "警告",
"file": "src/index.js",
"startLine": 184,
"endLine": 245,
"problem": "建問題模式新增「issue 建立前暫存留言、建立後依序沖刷」的狀態流程,但沒有對應測試。尚未驗證 createIssue 或沖刷途中拋錯、空 buffer、重複呼叫、以及一般/建問題模式留言目的地是否正確;失敗路徑可能造成 issue 已建立但內容不完整或留言誤發到 PR。",
"suggestion": "補主流程整合測試並 mock Gitea API,驗證:一般模式直接發 PR 且記錄留言 id;issue 未建立時只暫存;建立後依序沖刷並清空 buffer;createIssue 與第 N 則沖刷留言失敗時以失敗結束且不再發布後續內容。屬測試架構決策(專案目前無測試框架)。",
"suggestedCode": ""
},
{
"id": "F004",
"reviewer": "Maya",
"focus": "testing",
"badge": "🧪",
"severity": "警告",
"file": "src/index.js",
"startLine": 309,
"endLine": 395,
"problem": "建問題模式核心分支被大幅改寫,但沒有測試驗證各種 findings 組合與 API 失敗行為。kept.length===0、只有嚴重、只有警告/建議、兩者皆有,以及標籤挑選/issue 建立/PR 回貼連結/相依 API 失敗等路徑尚未試煉,無法確認「無問題完全靜默」「有問題才建 issue」及相依失敗僅降級等契約成立。",
"suggestion": "以參數化測試覆蓋 findings 四種組合,斷言 API 呼叫順序/次數/issue number/統計;並分別讓 listLabelsselectLabelscreateIssue/問題留言/PR 連結留言/addIssueDependency 拋錯,驗證哪些中止、哪些僅記警告續行;零 findings 時斷言所有寫入 API 皆不呼叫。屬測試架構決策。",
"suggestedCode": ""
},
{
"id": "F006",
"reviewer": "Maya",
"focus": "testing",
"badge": "🧪",
"severity": "警告",
"file": "src/lib/gitrepo.js",
"startLine": 103,
"endLine": 157,
"problem": "resolveMergeBase 新增多階段 fetch/重試策略,卻沒有測試鎖定淺層與失敗路徑:首次成功提早返回、非 shallow 不 unshallow、某次 fetch 失敗後仍嘗試下一策略、補抓成功立即停止、全部失敗時診斷與 cause 是否完整;易因呼叫順序或 off-by-one 在 runner 上才暴露。",
"suggestion": "將 git 執行器注入或 stub,建立表格化案例覆蓋首次成功/unshallow 後成功/deepen base 後成功/deepen HEAD 後成功/各 fetch 個別失敗/全部失敗;逐案斷言 git 參數與順序、成功後不再額外 fetch,並檢查最終錯誤含各策略成敗摘要且保留首次錯誤為 cause。屬可測性重構+測試架構決策。",
"suggestedCode": ""
},
{
"id": "F007",
"reviewer": "Maya",
"focus": "testing",
"badge": "🧪",
"severity": "警告",
"file": "src/lib/gitrepo.js",
"startLine": 249,
"endLine": 289,
"problem": "推送流程新增 pushToken 分支,但沒有測試驗證兩套認證策略:有 PAT 時略過 origin、PAT 推送失敗不退回其他 token、無 PAT 時 origin 成功不重試、origin 失敗才用一般 token;也沒有案例保護含憑證資訊不出現在錯誤或測試輸出中。(本次已將認證改經 env 傳入並遮蔽 push 錯誤,測試仍待補。)",
"suggestion": "mock git 執行器與 URLenv 組裝,補測 pushToken 有值/空、origin 成功/失敗、PAT 推送失敗及含特殊字元等案例;斷言 push 目標與呼叫次數,並確保任何拋出的錯誤、log 或快照都不含原始 token。屬測試架構決策。",
"suggestedCode": ""
},
{
"id": "F009",
"reviewer": "Bard",
"focus": "style",
"badge": "🎼",
"severity": "建議",
"file": "action.yml",
"startLine": 47,
"endLine": 61,
"problem": "push-token 的用途與退回行為在區塊註解、欄位描述、required 與 default 註解中反覆說明,且單行 description 過長,資訊雖完整但重複,日後修改語意易只改到一處。",
"suggestion": "保留一段「為何需要 PAT」的必要背景,其餘讓欄位名稱、required、default 自行表意,將 description 收斂成呼叫端真正需要知道的契約。註:本專案採 doc-funcs 高密度註解慣例,是否精簡屬慣例取捨,需維護者確認。",
"suggestedCode": " # 專用推送 PAT;以 PAT 推送可重新觸發 CI。留空時沿用 token。\n push-token:\n description: '推送審查結果 commit 的 PAT(留空時沿用 token'\n required: false\n default: ''"
}
],
"excluded": []
}