Compare commits

..

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
jiantw83 7caf3d0490 Merge pull request 'feat: 前置驗證納入 git push 認證檢查' (#10) from feat/preflight-auth-check into develop
Reviewed-on: #10
2026-06-16 06:20:09 +00:00
AI Review Bot fce2cd3c45 chore: update ai-review findings [ai-review-bot][success]
AI / 計算版本號 (pull_request) Successful in 3s
AI / Code Review (pull_request) Successful in 4s
2026-06-16 06:19:36 +00:00
Jeffery 33f1291a0f chore: triage preflight TLS finding 為誤報並寫入 exclusions
AI / 計算版本號 (pull_request) Successful in 4s
AI / Code Review (pull_request) Successful in 4m16s
Maya critical(app/preflight.js:107):verifyLLM 的 axios.post 未帶
httpsAgent,認為 GITEA_SKIP_TLS_VERIFY 未套用到 LLM 請求。

判定為誤報並移入 exclusions:
- GITEA_SKIP_TLS_VERIFY 為 Gitea 端(內網自簽憑證)專用設定,外部 LLM
  服務(Gemini/OpenAI/Claude)應維持 TLS 驗證,套用此 flag 屬安全降級
- 與既有 app/llm.js 排除一致(已刻意移除 rejectUnauthorized:false 還原
  TLS 驗證)

findings.json 清空(已排除)。

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-16 14:15:00 +08:00
AI Review Bot cedcb04424 chore: update ai-review findings [ai-review-bot][failure]
AI / 計算版本號 (pull_request) Successful in 3s
AI / Code Review (pull_request) Failing after 5s
2026-06-16 05:52:21 +00:00
Jeffery 9d780788e9 test: 補齊 runPreflight 測試並 triage preflight findings
AI / 計算版本號 (pull_request) Successful in 4s
AI / Code Review (pull_request) Failing after 1m42s
triage 6 筆 review findings:1 筆修正、5 筆移入 exclusions。

修正(Maya, warning):runPreflight 僅測過 env 缺失早退,缺成功路徑與
各失敗點覆蓋。將其驗證步驟改為可注入的 deps 參數(預設沿用原函式,
行為不變),並補上完整成功、comment 略過、各失敗點早停、workspace
傳遞共 8 個測試。

移入 exclusions(誤報,保留原文):
- Rex critical:GITEA_SKIP_TLS_VERIFY 為預設開啟驗證的 opt-in 設定,
  與既有 gitea.js 排除一致,非漏洞
- Leo warning:verifyLLM 內聚清楚,拆分屬主觀重構
- Zara warning:每把 key 30s timeout 為刻意的可靠性下限,僅失敗時累積
- Rex info:axios 錯誤訊息不含認證標頭/內容
- Aria info:預設參數引用 config 常數為刻意且利於測試的 pattern

findings.json 清空(全部已修正或排除)。app/ 測試 112 pass。

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-16 13:49:30 +08:00
AI Review Bot 7ba9a4e223 chore: update ai-review findings [ai-review-bot][failure]
AI / 計算版本號 (pull_request) Successful in 4s
AI / Code Review (pull_request) Failing after 5s
2026-06-16 04:04:57 +00:00
4 changed files with 146 additions and 7 deletions
+30
View File
@@ -351,5 +351,35 @@
"location": "Dockerfile, app/git.js, app/gitea.js",
"suggestion": "此變更引入了新的代理(agent)相關路徑(例如 `.agents/` 和 `AGENTS.md`),並在 `Dockerfile` 的 `COPY` 指令、`app/git.js` 中的 `SYNC_PATHS`、`FORCE_SYNC_FILE_PATHS`、`SYNC_TREE_PATHS` 陣列,以及 `app/gitea.js` 的 `filterDiff` 陣列中重複添加了這些路徑。這種模式導致了程式碼重複,每次新增一個代理都需要手動修改多個檔案和多個列表,增加了維護成本和出錯的可能性。建議考慮引入一個集中的設定檔或機制,例如透過掃描特定目錄來動態生成這些路徑列表,以提高模組化和可擴展性。",
"is_new": true
},
{
"role": "Rex",
"location": "app/preflight.js:12",
"suggestion": "程式碼中根據 `GITEA_SKIP_TLS_VERIFY` 環境變數來禁用 TLS 憑證驗證 (`rejectUnauthorized: false`),這會使應用程式容易受到中間人 (Man-in-the-Middle, MITM) 攻擊。攻擊者可能在不被察覺的情況下攔截和修改與 Gitea 伺服器的通訊。建議移除此功能,或確保在任何生產環境中永不啟用。如果 Gitea 伺服器使用自簽憑證,應將其憑證加入信任儲存區,而非禁用驗證。"
},
{
"role": "Leo",
"location": "app/preflight.js:56",
"suggestion": "函式 `verifyLLM` 處理了多種 LLM 供應商的驗證邏輯(Ollama、Claude、OpenAI 相容等),導致其長度較長且複雜度較高。建議將不同供應商的驗證邏輯拆分成獨立的輔助函式(例如 `_verifyOllama`、`_verifyOpenAICompatible`),以提高模組化程度和可讀性。"
},
{
"role": "Zara",
"location": "app/preflight.js:70-82",
"suggestion": "在 `verifyLLM` 函式中,當配置了多個 LLM API Key 時,系統會依序嘗試驗證每個 Key,每個嘗試都有 30 秒的逾時時間。如果前幾個 Key 驗證失敗,這可能導致顯著的累積延遲。雖然這是為了找到一個可用的 Key,但若 Key 數量多且網路不穩定,可能會造成啟動時間過長。可以考慮縮短單次 Key 驗證的逾時時間,或在特定情況下提供更快的失敗機制。"
},
{
"role": "Rex",
"location": "app/preflight.js:100",
"suggestion": "在記錄 LLM API 驗證失敗時,直接輸出了錯誤訊息 `e.message`。雖然通常情況下 `e.message` 不會包含敏感資訊,但為了最佳安全實踐,建議審查 LLM 服務提供商的錯誤訊息格式,確保其中不會意外洩漏 API 金鑰或其他敏感請求內容。若有疑慮,應對錯誤訊息進行消毒或僅記錄高層次的錯誤類型。"
},
{
"role": "Aria",
"location": "app/preflight.js:30",
"suggestion": "在 `checkRequiredEnv`、`verifyGiteaToken` 和 `verifyCommentToken` 等函式中,預設參數直接引用了從 `config.js` 匯入的常數。雖然這在功能上可行,但為了提高程式碼的清晰度和一致性,建議考慮以下兩種方式之一:1. 將所有配置值作為明確的參數從呼叫端傳入。2. 讓函式直接從 `config.js` 模組中讀取這些值,而不是透過預設參數。"
},
{
"role": "Maya",
"location": "app/preflight.js:107",
"suggestion": "在 `verifyLLM` 函數中,呼叫 `axios.post` 時缺少 `httpsAgent` 選項。這會導致即使設定了 `GITEA_SKIP_TLS_VERIFY`LLM 的 API 請求仍可能因 TLS 憑證問題而失敗。請將 `httpsAgent` 傳遞給 `axios.post` 的選項物件,例如:`await axios.post(`${base}/chat/completions`, payload, { headers, timeout: 30000, httpsAgent });`"
}
]
+37 -1
View File
@@ -1 +1,37 @@
[]
[
{
"level": "warning",
"role": "Aria",
"location": "app/preflight.test.js:25",
"suggestion": "測試描述使用英文。請確保專案在測試描述的語言上保持一致性。如果專案主要使用繁體中文(如 `app/preflight.js` 中的 JSDoc 和日誌),則應將此測試描述翻譯為繁體中文。",
"is_new": true
},
{
"level": "info",
"role": "Aria",
"location": "app/preflight.test.js:1-4",
"suggestion": "匯入語句的排序不一致。建議遵循一致的排序規則,例如:內建模組、第三方模組、本地模組,並在各組內按字母順序排序。",
"is_new": true
},
{
"level": "info",
"role": "Aria",
"location": "app/preflight.test.js:7-12",
"suggestion": "此陣列字面量較長。雖然已分行,但可以考慮將每個元素獨立一行並保持一致的縮排,以提高可讀性。",
"is_new": true
},
{
"level": "info",
"role": "Aria",
"location": "app/preflight.test.js:14",
"suggestion": "函數名稱 `clearLLMEnv` 雖然可理解,但可以更具描述性,例如 `clearLlmEnvironmentVariables` 或 `resetLlmEnv`。",
"is_new": true
},
{
"level": "info",
"role": "Aria",
"location": "app/preflight.test.js:149",
"suggestion": "此單行註解風格與其他部分可能不一致。建議遵循專案統一的註解風格指南。",
"is_new": true
}
]
+13 -6
View File
@@ -93,24 +93,31 @@ export async function verifyLLM() {
* 集中執行所有驗證相關設定的前置檢查;全部通過回傳 true,任一失敗回傳 false。
* 僅做唯讀的認證/連線確認,不發布任何 comment。
*/
export async function runPreflight(workspace = process.env.GITHUB_WORKSPACE || '/workspace') {
export async function runPreflight(workspace = process.env.GITHUB_WORKSPACE || '/workspace', deps = {}) {
const {
checkEnv = checkRequiredEnv,
verifyToken = verifyGiteaToken,
verifyComment = verifyCommentToken,
verifyRemote = verifyRemoteAccess,
verifyLLMFn = verifyLLM,
} = deps;
step('Step1.5', '前置驗證(驗證相關設定)');
const env = checkRequiredEnv();
const env = checkEnv();
if (!env.ok) {
error(`缺少必要環境變數: ${env.missing.join(', ')}`);
return false;
}
ok('必要環境變數齊全 (GITEA_TOKEN, GITEA_REPOSITORY, PR_NUMBER)');
const gitea = await verifyGiteaToken();
const gitea = await verifyToken();
if (!gitea.ok) {
error(`GITEA_TOKEN 驗證失敗(無法讀取 repo ${GITEA_REPOSITORY}: ${gitea.error}`);
return false;
}
ok(`GITEA_TOKEN 可讀取 repo ${GITEA_REPOSITORY}`);
const comment = await verifyCommentToken();
const comment = await verifyComment();
if (!comment.ok) {
error(`GITEA_COMMENT_TOKEN 驗證失敗: ${comment.error}`);
return false;
@@ -118,14 +125,14 @@ export async function runPreflight(workspace = process.env.GITHUB_WORKSPACE || '
if (comment.skipped) line('未提供 GITEA_COMMENT_TOKENcomment 將沿用 GITEA_TOKEN');
else ok('GITEA_COMMENT_TOKEN 可用');
const remote = verifyRemoteAccess(workspace);
const remote = verifyRemote(workspace);
if (!remote.ok) {
error(`git push 認證/連線驗證失敗(ls-remote: ${remote.error}`);
return false;
}
ok('git remote 認證可用(ls-remote 成功)');
const llm = await verifyLLM();
const llm = await verifyLLMFn();
if (!llm.ok) {
error(`LLM 驗證失敗: ${llm.error}`);
return false;
+66
View File
@@ -188,10 +188,76 @@ describe('verifyLLM', () => {
});
describe('runPreflight', () => {
// Stub deps that all succeed; individual tests override one to fail.
function makeDeps(overrides = {}) {
return {
checkEnv: () => ({ ok: true, missing: [] }),
verifyToken: async () => ({ ok: true }),
verifyComment: async () => ({ ok: true }),
verifyRemote: () => ({ ok: true }),
verifyLLMFn: async () => ({ ok: true, provider: 'openai', keyIndex: 1, total: 1 }),
...overrides,
};
}
it('returns false and stops early when required env is missing', async () => {
// Config constants default to empty in the test environment, so the
// required-env check fails before any network call is attempted.
const result = await runPreflight();
assert.equal(result, false);
});
it('returns true when every verification step succeeds', async () => {
const result = await runPreflight('/ws', makeDeps());
assert.equal(result, true);
});
it('returns true when the comment token check is skipped', async () => {
const result = await runPreflight('/ws', makeDeps({
verifyComment: async () => ({ ok: true, skipped: true }),
}));
assert.equal(result, true);
});
it('returns false when the Gitea token check fails', async () => {
let remoteCalled = false;
const result = await runPreflight('/ws', makeDeps({
verifyToken: async () => ({ ok: false, error: 'HTTP 401' }),
verifyRemote: () => { remoteCalled = true; return { ok: true }; },
}));
assert.equal(result, false);
assert.equal(remoteCalled, false, 'should stop before later checks');
});
it('returns false when the comment token check fails', async () => {
const result = await runPreflight('/ws', makeDeps({
verifyComment: async () => ({ ok: false, error: 'HTTP 401' }),
}));
assert.equal(result, false);
});
it('returns false when git remote access fails', async () => {
let llmCalled = false;
const result = await runPreflight('/ws', makeDeps({
verifyRemote: () => ({ ok: false, error: 'auth failed' }),
verifyLLMFn: async () => { llmCalled = true; return { ok: true }; },
}));
assert.equal(result, false);
assert.equal(llmCalled, false, 'should stop before the LLM check');
});
it('returns false when LLM verification fails', async () => {
const result = await runPreflight('/ws', makeDeps({
verifyLLMFn: async () => ({ ok: false, error: '所有 key 驗證失敗' }),
}));
assert.equal(result, false);
});
it('passes the workspace through to the remote-access check', async () => {
let captured;
await runPreflight('/custom/ws', makeDeps({
verifyRemote: (ws) => { captured = ws; return { ok: true }; },
}));
assert.equal(captured, '/custom/ws');
});
});