import test from 'node:test'; import assert from 'node:assert/strict'; import { readReference, readPrompt, assertNeutralPrompt } from './helpers/prompt-doc.js'; const RULES = readReference('delegation'); const PROMPTS = ['sdlc-plan', 'sdlc-analyze', 'sdlc-feat', 'sdlc-fix', 'sdlc-sync', 'sdlc-report']; const EXPECTED = [ ['sdlc-plan', '列出九段落依據與缺漏'], ['sdlc-analyze', '對四份清單列出疑點'], ['sdlc-analyze', '算出截止日'], ['sdlc-feat', '把議題標題翻成英文'], ['sdlc-feat', '分批提交方案'], ]; function tableEntries() { return [...RULES.matchAll(/^\| `([^`]+)` \| ([^|]+) \|/gm)] .map((match) => [match[1], match[2].trim()]); } function promptMarkers(name) { const prompt = readPrompt(name); return [...prompt.matchAll(/^### (?:\d+\.\s+)?(.+?)〔可委派〕\s*$/gm)] .map((match) => [name, match[1].trim()]); } // ── 四條判準與雙向集合 ──────────────────────────────────────────── test('委派規則保留四條判準與兩條硬排除', () => { for (const term of ['可驗證的成品', '不會詢問使用者', '失敗能被呼叫端偵測', '不直接寫入 Gitea 或 git']) { assert.match(RULES, new RegExp(term)); } }); test('委派表與六份正本的標記集合完全一致', () => { const table = tableEntries(); const markers = PROMPTS.flatMap(promptMarkers); assert.deepEqual(table, EXPECTED); assert.deepEqual(markers, EXPECTED); }); test('每個標記步驟都說明能力降級與部分委派邊界', () => { for (const [name, step] of EXPECTED) { const prompt = readPrompt(name); const marker = prompt.match(new RegExp(`^### (?:\\d+\\.\\s+)?${step}〔可委派〕\\s*$`, 'm')); assert.ok(marker, `${name} 缺少標記:${step}`); const start = marker.index; const body = prompt.slice(start, prompt.indexOf('\n### ', start + 1) === -1 ? prompt.length : prompt.indexOf('\n### ', start + 1)); assert.match(body, /你的環境若能把工作交給子代理|實際執行.*不委派/); } }); // ── 六份正本的平台與文字契約 ────────────────────────────────────── test('六份流程正本均為平台中立且使用正確 description 前綴', () => { for (const name of PROMPTS) assertNeutralPrompt(readPrompt(name), name); }); test('沒有委派標記的流程仍明確列入規則表的空集合', () => { for (const name of ['sdlc-fix', 'sdlc-sync', 'sdlc-report']) { assert.equal(promptMarkers(name).length, 0, `${name} 不應偷偷出現委派步驟`); } assert.match(RULES, /sdlc-sync.*sdlc-fix.*sdlc-report/); });