plugins/sdlc
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests 1 Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat(link): 連結一律寫成 [文字](絕對網址)，寫入前先驗證連得到

Browse Source 
取消 [[頁名]] 與 [[顯示文字|頁名]] 兩種同 wiki 寫法，不再分「同存取庫」與
「跨存取庫」兩條規則。那種寫法只在自己那個 wiki 內解析，寫錯不報錯，畫面上
看起來像普通文字或死連結，巡不到也修不了。

連結寫進頁面前先過 jsc-gitea 的 link-check.sh，結束碼 0 才寫。驗證一律走 API，
不看網頁狀態碼：私有存取庫的網頁網址對未登入請求一律回 404，拿狀態碼判會把
好連結判成壞的。認證失敗回 7，與死連結的 1 分開，免得金鑰一過期就把還在的頁
整批判死。
This commit is contained in:
jiantw83
2026-09-02 14:27:18 +08:00
parent fc4e4a00e2
commit f4e489ceb4
17 changed files with 214 additions and 56 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
skills/analyze/SKILL.md
+20 -8
View File
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ This skill is a **logic-only** stage: never output code, and **never modify any
`{HASH}` = the shared wiki hash for `{owner}/{repo}`, computed by `jsc-gitea/tools/hash-id` (see `jsc-gitea:wiki`). It prints the **full 40-character uppercase SHA-1** of its input — no truncation to 8 characters, no prefix rewrite. Never shorten it by hand: a shortened name points at a page nobody else writes to. `REPO_{HASH}` runs the same command over that repository's own `{owner}/{repo}`, so a multi-repository analysis holds one inventory page per repository.
**Content pages and directory pages live in different wiki repos.** `ANALYZE_{HASH}` sits in the repo `jsc-gitea/tools/gitea.sh wiki-repo ANALYZE` resolves, `REPO_{HASH}` in the one `gitea.sh wiki-repo REPO` resolves. All three directory pages — `ANALYZE_CONTENTS`, `PLAN_CONTENTS` and `REPO_CONTENTS` — sit in the repo `gitea.sh wiki-repo CONTENTS` resolves: `JSC_WIKI_REPO_CONTENTS` first, `JSC_WIKI_REPO` second, exit 3 when neither is set; it **never** falls back to `JSC_WIKI_REPO_ANALYZE`, `JSC_WIKI_REPO_PLAN` or `JSC_WIKI_REPO_REPO`. Because directory and content pages sit in different wikis, every directory row links its content page by the absolute URL from `gitea.sh wiki-url {content repo} {page}`; `[[...]]` resolves only inside one wiki and would dead-link from the directory.
**Content pages and directory pages live in different wiki repos.** `ANALYZE_{HASH}` sits in the repo `jsc-gitea/tools/gitea.sh wiki-repo ANALYZE` resolves, `REPO_{HASH}` in the one `gitea.sh wiki-repo REPO` resolves. All three directory pages — `ANALYZE_CONTENTS`, `PLAN_CONTENTS` and `REPO_CONTENTS` — sit in the repo `gitea.sh wiki-repo CONTENTS` resolves: `JSC_WIKI_REPO_CONTENTS` first, `JSC_WIKI_REPO` second, exit 3 when neither is set; it **never** falls back to `JSC_WIKI_REPO_ANALYZE`, `JSC_WIKI_REPO_PLAN` or `JSC_WIKI_REPO_REPO`. Every directory row links its content page by the absolute URL from `gitea.sh wiki-url {content repo} {page}`, written as `[{text}]({url})` — one link syntax, whichever wiki the two pages sit in. The syntax and the check that runs before every write: "Every link is checked before it reaches a page" below.
All wiki reads and writes go through `jsc-gitea:wiki`. **A failed wiki read or write stops this stage**: report which page and which operation failed, never carry on against a page you could not read, and never report a page as saved when the write failed. Step 11 still runs after such a stop.
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ All wiki reads and writes go through `jsc-gitea:wiki`. **A failed wiki read or w
1. Every file in the working directory, at the commit `origin/{source-branch}` points to (verified in step 4).
2. **Reuse an existing method or endpoint unless its logic cannot satisfy the requirement**:
- Check the `REPO_{HASH}` inventory page first, in the REPO wiki repo. **Its `{HASH}` is `hash-id` over that repository's own `{owner}/{repo}`** — one inventory page per repository, so a multi-repository analysis holds one `REPO_{HASH}` per repository and never one shared page. Re-inventory when the feature or endpoint is missing, or when the recorded commit sha differs from the current one.
- Re-inventory **MUST run as a sub agent**: analyze the repository's features and endpoints, attach the current commit sha, write back to `REPO_{HASH}` with `templates/repo-page.md`, then upsert this repository's row in `REPO_CONTENTS` with `jsc-gitea/tools/wiki-contents.sh upsert REPO 1 {owner}/{repo} {row file} templates/repo-contents.md`. The row follows `templates/repo-contents.md`, and the key is column 1, the repository name, written exactly as the row file writes it. Its 盤點頁 cell holds the absolute URL from `gitea.sh wiki-url {REPO repo} REPO_{HASH}` — take that URL first and branch on the exit code per "Every cross-repo link comes from `wiki-url`" below, because the row must never carry an empty link cell.
- Re-inventory **MUST run as a sub agent**: analyze the repository's features and endpoints, attach the current commit sha, write back to `REPO_{HASH}` with `templates/repo-page.md`, then upsert this repository's row in `REPO_CONTENTS` with `jsc-gitea/tools/wiki-contents.sh upsert REPO 1 {owner}/{repo} {row file} templates/repo-contents.md`. The row follows `templates/repo-contents.md`, and the key is column 1, the repository name, written exactly as the row file writes it. Its 盤點頁 cell holds the absolute URL from `gitea.sh wiki-url {REPO repo} REPO_{HASH}`, written as `[{text}]({url})` — take that URL first, check it with `jsc-gitea/tools/link-check.sh`, and branch on both exit codes per "Every link comes from `wiki-url`, and is checked before it is written" below, because the row must never carry an empty or dead link cell.
- Never hand-edit `REPO_CONTENTS`, and never touch a row belonging to another repository. Branch on the script's exit code — see "Contents pages are appended, never overwritten" below. `REPO_{HASH}` is a content page for one repository, so rewriting it whole is correct; the directory page around it is not.
- For each reuse candidate, confirm the file path and method name first, then analyze whether its logic fits the requirement. Reject a candidate only for a stated reason, and record both the candidate and that reason in the analysis page's 複用決策 field.
@@ -41,11 +41,11 @@ All wiki reads and writes go through `jsc-gitea:wiki`. **A failed wiki read or w
2. Every scenario states its input, its expected result, its data source and the work package it belongs to.
3. **Every TDD todo is one whole cycle**: one seam, one failing test first, one minimal implementation, one green verification, and a post-green refactor where it is needed. Never split the red test, the minimal implementation and the green verification into separate todos. Seams and anti-patterns: `references/tdd.md`.
4. Completion condition: every user story has scenarios under `## 使用者故事驗收計畫`; every scenario carries an explicit acceptance method and data source; the scenario count matches the story's complexity; every work package has its own subsection under `## 測試計畫（TDD）`; every implementation work package holds at least one test-first `[ ]` todo; and every todo states its seam, its acceptance scenario, the behaviour the test asserts, the minimal implementation scope and how green is verified. A pure delivery package may use document-verification or sample-data-verification todos instead, and still states the test evidence or the review evidence that proves the spec is usable.
10. **Write the analysis page and its catalogue entries in one wiki pass.** Apply `templates/analyze-page.md` to create or update the analysis page **in the ANALYZE wiki repo** and write it back via `jsc-gitea:wiki`; the page content is Traditional Chinese, exactly as the template dictates. Both directory rows then go through `jsc-gitea/tools/wiki-contents.sh`, never a hand-edited page:
- `jsc-gitea/tools/wiki-contents.sh upsert ANALYZE 3 {HASH} {row file} templates/analyze-contents.md` — the row follows `templates/analyze-contents.md` and the key is the HASH column, column 3. Its 分析頁 cell holds the absolute URL from `gitea.sh wiki-url {ANALYZE repo} ANALYZE_{HASH}`: take that URL after the analysis page is saved and branch on the exit code per "Every cross-repo link comes from `wiki-url`" below, because the row must never carry an empty link cell.
10. **Write the analysis page and its catalogue entries in one wiki pass.** Apply `templates/analyze-page.md` to create or update the analysis page **in the ANALYZE wiki repo** and write it back via `jsc-gitea:wiki`; the page content is Traditional Chinese, exactly as the template dictates. **Every link the page carries — the plan page, the inventory page, issues, anything external — is written as `[{text}]({url})` and passes `jsc-gitea/tools/link-check.sh` before the write**, per "Every link comes from `wiki-url`, and is checked before it is written" below. Both directory rows then go through `jsc-gitea/tools/wiki-contents.sh`, never a hand-edited page:
- `jsc-gitea/tools/wiki-contents.sh upsert ANALYZE 3 {HASH} {row file} templates/analyze-contents.md` — the row follows `templates/analyze-contents.md` and the key is the HASH column, column 3. Its 分析頁 cell holds the absolute URL from `gitea.sh wiki-url {ANALYZE repo} ANALYZE_{HASH}`, written as `[{text}]({url})`: take that URL after the analysis page is saved, check it with `jsc-gitea/tools/link-check.sh`, and branch on both exit codes per "Every link comes from `wiki-url`, and is checked before it is written" below, because the row must never carry an empty or dead link cell.
- `jsc-gitea/tools/wiki-contents.sh upsert PLAN 4 {HASH} {row file} templates/plan-contents.md` — rebuild that plan's row from the one the page already holds, change only its status to the literal 「已分析」, and keep every other cell (including the absolute plan-page link) byte-for-byte as it was. The key is the HASH column, column 4.
Both runs branch on the exit code per "Contents pages are appended, never overwritten" below. Completion condition: the analysis page is saved on the wiki carrying every section the template dictates — the source branch, the head sha and the 未決項 section (「無」 when there is none) included — every `wiki-url` call this step made returned 0 and its URL is the one in the row, both `wiki-contents.sh` runs exited 0, and `ANALYZE_CONTENTS` shows this analysis's row while `PLAN_CONTENTS` shows the literal 「已分析」.
Both runs branch on the exit code per "Contents pages are appended, never overwritten" below. Completion condition: the analysis page is saved on the wiki carrying every section the template dictates — the source branch, the head sha and the 未決項 section (「無」 when there is none) included — every `wiki-url` call this step made returned 0 and its URL is the one in the row, every link written by this step was cleared by a `link-check.sh` run that exited 0, both `wiki-contents.sh` runs exited 0, and `ANALYZE_CONTENTS` shows this analysis's row while `PLAN_CONTENTS` shows the literal 「已分析」.
11. **Stage report — the last thing this stage does, including every early stop** (the model gate blocked, the working tree did not match `origin/{source-branch}`, no plan was selectable, a wiki read or write failed). Run `tools/stage-report.sh analyze` with one `--page TYPE:{page}` per wiki page this run wrote — `--page ANALYZE:ANALYZE_{HASH}`, `--page CONTENTS:ANALYZE_CONTENTS`, `--page CONTENTS:PLAN_CONTENTS`, and `--page REPO:REPO_{HASH}` plus `--page CONTENTS:REPO_CONTENTS` when a re-inventory happened. **Every directory page takes the `CONTENTS` type**: the script resolves each page's repo from the TYPE you pass, and a directory page passed under its old type resolves the wrong repo and prints no URL. Add `--worklog` and `--worklog-heading` when a work log entry exists. No work log yet: write this stage's log content to a file — with a Bash heredoc or `mktemp` per Hard limits, never with `Write` or `Edit` — and pass `--pending-file {file} --log-hash {HASH}` so it is held for the next `jsc-log:worklog` run. Rules and exit codes: `references/stage-report.md`. Exit 1 is a warning, never a block. Completion condition: the script's output is reported to the user verbatim, and every wiki page this run wrote appears in it.
## Contents pages are appended, never overwritten
@@ -68,9 +68,11 @@ Why 7 and 8 abort: both mean the old content is unknown, not that the page is mi
Completion condition: every directory-page write this stage made names the `wiki-contents.sh` exit code it branched on, and no directory page was created on any code other than 4.
## Every cross-repo link comes from `wiki-url`
## Every link comes from `wiki-url`, and is checked before it is written
Both directory rows this stage writes — `REPO_CONTENTS` in step 5.2 and `ANALYZE_CONTENTS` in step 10 — link a content page that lives in another wiki repo, so the cell holds the absolute URL `gitea.sh wiki-url {content repo} {page}` printed and nothing else. Run it **after** that content page is saved, and branch on its exit code; this is the same branching `jsc-log:worklog` runs over the same call.
**One syntax.** Every link this stage writes — on `ANALYZE_{HASH}` and `REPO_{HASH}`, in the `ANALYZE_CONTENTS`, `PLAN_CONTENTS` and `REPO_CONTENTS` rows, in the stage report — is written as `[{text}]({url})`. The `{url}` is the absolute URL `gitea.sh wiki-url {repo} {page}` printed, used verbatim: never assemble a wiki path by hand, and never write a link as `[[頁名]]` or `[[顯示文字|頁名]]`. That form resolves only inside the wiki it sits in, and it fails without an error — the reader sees plain text or a dead link, so a wrong link is neither noticed nor fixable.
Run `wiki-url` **after** the content page it names is saved, and branch on its exit code; this is the same branching `jsc-log:worklog` runs over the same call.
| Exit | What this step does |
| --- | --- |
@@ -82,7 +84,17 @@ Both directory rows this stage writes — `REPO_CONTENTS` in step 5.2 and `ANALY
Never let an empty string stand in for the URL. A row whose link cell is empty is a directory entry that points nowhere, the reader has no way to reach the page it names, and the next run replaces that row as if it were correct.
Completion condition: every row this stage upserted carries a URL that came out of a `wiki-url` run that exited 0, and every non-zero code was branched on as this table says.
**Checked before it is written.** Collect every link the page or the row is about to carry, hand them all to `jsc-gitea/tools/link-check.sh` in one run — `link-check.sh {網址}...`, or the same URLs on stdin, one per line — and write only when that run exits 0. It prints one `{OK|DEAD|SKIP}<TAB>{網址}<TAB>{說明}` line per URL. The check goes through the API, never a web status code: a private repository's web URL answers 404 to a request carrying no key, so a status-code check marks live pages dead.
| Exit | What this step does |
| --- | --- |
| 0 | every link answers — write the page or upsert the row |
| 1 | at least one link is dead — **write nothing**, and report the `DEAD` lines to the user |
| 2 | usage error: not one URL was passed — pass the links and run it again |
| 3 | the list holds a Gitea URL but `GITEA_HOST` is unset — report it as a setting to fix and run it again, and never skip the check instead |
| 7 | Gitea authentication failed (401/403) — stop and report the key problem. Never read this as exit 1: an expired key makes live pages look absent, and a row rewritten on that reading loses the links that were fine |
Completion condition: every row this stage upserted carries a URL that came out of a `wiki-url` run that exited 0, every page and row this stage wrote was cleared by a `link-check.sh` run that exited 0, and every non-zero code from either script was branched on as these tables say.
## Delivery package is WP-01
skills/implement/SKILL.md
+23 -7
View File
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Goal: complete the analysis page's todos one by one; **update the wiki status im
`jsc-gitea/tools/hash-id` prints the **full 40-character uppercase SHA-1** of its input — no truncation to 8 characters, no prefix rewrite. Every `{HASH}` this stage builds carries that full length: the page names, the worktree path and the work ticket of step 6 alike. Never shorten one by hand.
**Content pages and directory pages live in different wiki repos.** `ANALYZE_{HASH}` sits in the repo `jsc-gitea/tools/gitea.sh wiki-repo ANALYZE` resolves and `DELIVER_{HASH}` in the one `gitea.sh wiki-repo DELIVER` resolves, while the directory pages `ANALYZE_CONTENTS`, `DELIVER_CONTENTS` and `MAINTAIN_CONTENTS` all sit in the repo `gitea.sh wiki-repo CONTENTS` resolves: `JSC_WIKI_REPO_CONTENTS` first, `JSC_WIKI_REPO` second, exit 3 when neither is set; it **never** falls back to the page type's own variable. Because directory and content pages sit in different wikis, every directory row links its content page by the absolute URL from `gitea.sh wiki-url {content repo} {page}`; `[[...]]` resolves only inside one wiki and would dead-link from the directory.
**Content pages and directory pages live in different wiki repos.** `ANALYZE_{HASH}` sits in the repo `jsc-gitea/tools/gitea.sh wiki-repo ANALYZE` resolves and `DELIVER_{HASH}` in the one `gitea.sh wiki-repo DELIVER` resolves, while the directory pages `ANALYZE_CONTENTS`, `DELIVER_CONTENTS` and `MAINTAIN_CONTENTS` all sit in the repo `gitea.sh wiki-repo CONTENTS` resolves: `JSC_WIKI_REPO_CONTENTS` first, `JSC_WIKI_REPO` second, exit 3 when neither is set; it **never** falls back to the page type's own variable. Every directory row links its content page by the absolute URL from `gitea.sh wiki-url {content repo} {page}`, written as `[{text}]({url})` — one link syntax, whichever wiki the two pages sit in. The syntax and the check that runs before every write: "Every link is checked before it reaches a page" below.
All wiki reads and writes go through `jsc-gitea:wiki`. **A failed wiki read or write stops this stage**: report which page and which operation failed, never carry on against a page you could not read, and never report a page as saved when the write failed. Step 13 still runs after such a stop.
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ All wiki reads and writes go through `jsc-gitea:wiki`. **A failed wiki read or w
3. **Start both audits together and let them run side by side** — they read the same diff and neither one's verdict changes the other's input, so the closing wait costs one audit, not two. Completion condition: both audits have returned, and both cleared — a pass from `code-review`, and either a pass or a reported skip from the API document audit.
11. **One work package finished → commit, push, PR back to the source branch, then hold on that PR until it merges**:
1. Call `jsc-git:pr` from inside the worktree, **passing `{source-branch}` as the base branch**. One package, one PR; the branch ladder and how the base is derived are in `references/branch.md`.
2. Write the PR URL and number into that work package's PR column on the analysis page and save it back to the wiki, so the next run of this skill can find it (step 2).
2. Write the PR URL and number into that work package's PR column on the analysis page as `[{text}]({url})`, **checked with `jsc-gitea/tools/link-check.sh` before the save** — see "Every link is checked before it reaches a page" below — and save the page back to the wiki, so the next run of this skill can find it (step 2).
3. Run `jsc-sdlc/tools/wp-gate.sh lock {owner}/{repo} {index} --wp {wp-number}`. The lock is what makes step 2's gate hold across work sessions — a new session starts blocked until that PR merges — and `--wp` is what hangs this PR on the claim from step 4.5, so `owns` can keep other sessions off it. Leave `--wp` out and every session is free to touch this PR. Branch on the exit code: exit 0 (`status=locked`) → proceed. Exit 2 (`status=usage`) → fix the arguments and run it again. Exit 3 (`status=missing-dep`) → the lock could not be recorded; report it and stop, because without the lock the next session starts unblocked on a PR that has not merged. Completion condition: the script printed `status=locked` and named the work package.
4. **The work package is finished the moment its PR is open — call `jsc-log:worklog` now**, under the Rules section's one-task-one-entry rule, reusing the PLAN and ANALYZE wiki repositories and page URLs resolved for this package in step 2.10. Completion condition: the entry is saved on `LOG_{HASH}` before the wait starts.
5. **Wait for the merge with `jsc-gitea/tools/pr-watch.sh {owner}/{repo} {index}`** — it polls every 60 seconds (`JSC_PR_WATCH_INTERVAL` overrides), never times out, and never repeats a comment it already reported. Branch on its exit code:
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ All wiki reads and writes go through `jsc-gitea:wiki`. **A failed wiki read or w
12. **Deliver the document, then register for maintenance** — one closing pass over the two questions this stage owes the user. A finished work package is a delivery, so **always ask before producing it; never pick a format silently and never skip either question**:
1. Ask per `jsc-ask:ask` rules which delivery format to produce. The options are fixed: **a `DELIVER_{HASH}` wiki page** or **a Gitea issue comment**. State the impact scope on each (the wiki page lives beside the plan and analysis pages; the issue comment reaches whoever follows that issue).
2. Both formats use the same structure — `templates/deliver-page.md`, in Traditional Chinese. Only the destination differs. Sample values and personal-data handling: `references/deliver-formats.md`.
3. Wiki page: write `DELIVER_{HASH}` into the DELIVER wiki repo through `jsc-gitea:wiki`, where `{HASH}` comes from `jsc-gitea/tools/hash-id` over `{owner}/{repo}` plus the work package number (for example `plugins/sdlc#WP-01`), so each work package gets its own page instead of overwriting the previous one. That input is what keeps the pages apart, and the full 40 characters `hash-id` prints are what the page is named — hashing the repository alone, or shortening the result, puts two work packages on one page again. Then upsert this work package's row with `jsc-gitea/tools/wiki-contents.sh upsert DELIVER 6 {HASH} {row file} templates/deliver-contents.md`: the row follows `templates/deliver-contents.md` and the key is the HASH column, column 6, written exactly as the row file writes it. Its 交付頁 cell holds the absolute URL from `gitea.sh wiki-url {DELIVER repo} DELIVER_{HASH}` — run that **after** the delivery page is saved and branch on its exit code, the same branching `jsc-log:worklog` runs over the same call:
3. Wiki page: write `DELIVER_{HASH}` into the DELIVER wiki repo through `jsc-gitea:wiki` — **every link that page carries is written as `[{text}]({url})` and passes `jsc-gitea/tools/link-check.sh` before the write**, per "Every link is checked before it reaches a page" below — where `{HASH}` comes from `jsc-gitea/tools/hash-id` over `{owner}/{repo}` plus the work package number (for example `plugins/sdlc#WP-01`), so each work package gets its own page instead of overwriting the previous one. That input is what keeps the pages apart, and the full 40 characters `hash-id` prints are what the page is named — hashing the repository alone, or shortening the result, puts two work packages on one page again. Then upsert this work package's row with `jsc-gitea/tools/wiki-contents.sh upsert DELIVER 6 {HASH} {row file} templates/deliver-contents.md`: the row follows `templates/deliver-contents.md` and the key is the HASH column, column 6, written exactly as the row file writes it. Its 交付頁 cell holds the absolute URL from `gitea.sh wiki-url {DELIVER repo} DELIVER_{HASH}`, written as `[{text}]({url})` — run that **after** the delivery page is saved and branch on its exit code, the same branching `jsc-log:worklog` runs over the same call:
| Exit | What this step does |
| --- | --- |
@@ -87,10 +87,10 @@ All wiki reads and writes go through `jsc-gitea:wiki`. **A failed wiki read or w
| 7 | the key is invalid or lacks permission (HTTP 401/403) — stop and report the key problem. Never read this as exit 4: the delivery page is alive, and treating it as absent records a delivered work package as one that was never delivered |
| 8 | any other API failure — stop and report that status, and do not retry the same call unchanged |
Never let an empty string stand in for the URL: a row whose 交付頁 cell is empty names a delivery nobody can open, and the next run replaces that row as if it were correct. Branch on the upsert's own exit code per "Contents pages are appended, never overwritten" below, and never hand-edit the directory page.
4. Issue comment: confirm the issue number with the user (propose the one referenced by the work package or the PR; never guess), then post via `jsc-gitea/tools/gitea.sh api POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{n}/comments` with the body passed in as a UTF-8 file — real newlines, never a literal `\n`.
5. With the delivery produced, ask per `jsc-ask:ask` rules whether to register this project for maintenance: upsert this repository's row with `jsc-gitea/tools/wiki-contents.sh upsert MAINTAIN 1 {owner}/{repo} {row file} templates/maintain-contents.md`, the row built from `templates/maintain-contents.md` and the key column 1, the repository name. Required: repository `{owner}/{repo}`, maintenance method, start date. Optional: end date (NULL = maintain forever), last-maintained time. `MAINTAIN` has no content page — this directory page is the whole record — so branch on the exit code per "Contents pages are appended, never overwritten" below and never hand-edit it.
6. Completion condition: the chosen delivery format has actually been produced and you have reported where it landed (wiki page name, or the comment URL); on the wiki-page format the `wiki-url` call returned 0 and its URL is the one in the 交付頁 cell, with any non-zero code branched on as sub-step 12.3 says; **and** the user has answered the maintenance question with a chosen registration saved on the wiki.
Never let an empty string stand in for the URL: a row whose 交付頁 cell is empty names a delivery nobody can open, and the next run replaces that row as if it were correct. **Check that URL with `jsc-gitea/tools/link-check.sh` and build the row only on exit 0** — a link that does not answer never goes into a directory everyone else reads. Branch on the upsert's own exit code per "Contents pages are appended, never overwritten" below, and never hand-edit the directory page.
4. Issue comment: confirm the issue number with the user (propose the one referenced by the work package or the PR; never guess), then post via `jsc-gitea/tools/gitea.sh api POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{n}/comments` with the body passed in as a UTF-8 file — real newlines, never a literal `\n`. Every link in that body is written as `[{text}]({url})` and passes `jsc-gitea/tools/link-check.sh` before the post: a comment is as hard to correct as a page once other people have read it.
5. With the delivery produced, ask per `jsc-ask:ask` rules whether to register this project for maintenance — any link that row carries is written as `[{text}]({url})` and passes `jsc-gitea/tools/link-check.sh` before the upsert: upsert this repository's row with `jsc-gitea/tools/wiki-contents.sh upsert MAINTAIN 1 {owner}/{repo} {row file} templates/maintain-contents.md`, the row built from `templates/maintain-contents.md` and the key column 1, the repository name. Required: repository `{owner}/{repo}`, maintenance method, start date. Optional: end date (NULL = maintain forever), last-maintained time. `MAINTAIN` has no content page — this directory page is the whole record — so branch on the exit code per "Contents pages are appended, never overwritten" below and never hand-edit it.
6. Completion condition: the chosen delivery format has actually been produced and you have reported where it landed (wiki page name, or the comment URL); on the wiki-page format the `wiki-url` call returned 0 and its URL is the one in the 交付頁 cell, with any non-zero code branched on as sub-step 12.3 says; every link written by this step was cleared by a `link-check.sh` run that exited 0; **and** the user has answered the maintenance question with a chosen registration saved on the wiki.
13. **Stage report — the last thing this stage does, including every early stop** (the work package gate blocked, no work package was selectable, the source branch was missing from the remote, a wiki read or write failed). Run `tools/stage-report.sh implement` with:
- one `--page TYPE:{page}` per wiki page this run wrote — `--page ANALYZE:ANALYZE_{HASH}`, `--page DELIVER:DELIVER_{HASH}`, `--page CONTENTS:DELIVER_CONTENTS`, `--page CONTENTS:MAINTAIN_CONTENTS`. **Every directory page takes the `CONTENTS` type**: the script resolves each page's repo from the TYPE you pass, and a directory page passed under its old type resolves the wrong repo and prints no URL;
- `--worklog` and `--worklog-heading` pointing at the entry step 11.4 wrote — following the Rules section's one-task-one-entry rule, a stage that finished anything already has one. `--pending-file {file} --log-hash {HASH}` is the fallback for a stage that stopped before any task finished: it holds the content for the next `jsc-log:worklog` run, and held content is not a written log;
@@ -98,6 +98,22 @@ All wiki reads and writes go through `jsc-gitea:wiki`. **A failed wiki read or w
Rules and exit codes: `references/stage-report.md`. Exit 1 is a warning, never a block. Completion condition: the script's output is reported to the user verbatim, and it names the worktree, all three branches and every wiki page this run wrote.
## Every link is checked before it reaches a page
**One syntax.** Every link this stage writes — on `DELIVER_{HASH}`, in the analysis page's PR column, in the `DELIVER_CONTENTS` and `MAINTAIN_CONTENTS` rows, in an issue comment, in the stage report — is written as `[{text}]({url})`. The `{url}` is the absolute URL `gitea.sh wiki-url {repo} {page}` printed, used verbatim: never assemble a wiki path by hand, and never write a link as `[[頁名]]` or `[[顯示文字|頁名]]`. That form resolves only inside the wiki it sits in, and it fails without an error — the reader sees plain text or a dead link, so a wrong link is neither noticed nor fixable.
**Checked before it is written.** Collect every link the page, the row or the comment is about to carry, hand them all to `jsc-gitea/tools/link-check.sh` in one run — `link-check.sh {網址}...`, or the same URLs on stdin, one per line — and write only when that run exits 0. It prints one `{OK|DEAD|SKIP}<TAB>{網址}<TAB>{說明}` line per URL. The check goes through the API, never a web status code: a private repository's web URL answers 404 to a request carrying no key, so a status-code check marks live pages dead.
| Exit | What this step does |
| --- | --- |
| 0 | every link answers — write the page, upsert the row, post the comment |
| 1 | at least one link is dead — **write nothing**, and report the `DEAD` lines to the user |
| 2 | usage error: not one URL was passed — pass the links and run it again |
| 3 | the list holds a Gitea URL but `GITEA_HOST` is unset — report it as a setting to fix and run it again, and never skip the check instead |
| 7 | Gitea authentication failed (401/403) — stop and report the key problem. Never read this as exit 1: an expired key makes live pages look absent, and a page rewritten on that reading loses the links that were fine |
Completion condition: every page, row and comment this stage wrote was cleared by a `link-check.sh` run that exited 0, and every non-zero code was branched on as this table says.
## Contents pages are appended, never overwritten
`DELIVER_CONTENTS` and `MAINTAIN_CONTENTS` are shared directories in the CONTENTS wiki repo: every row on them belongs to somebody's work package or repository, and this run reads none of those rows from anywhere else. So every write to them is an upsert of one row — never a whole-page overwrite, and never a row this run does not own. `jsc-gitea/tools/wiki-contents.sh upsert` is the one way this stage does it: it resolves the CONTENTS repo, reads the whole page, replaces the row whose key column matches and appends when none matches, then writes the page back.
skills/maintain/SKILL.md
+18 -2
View File
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ description: 'SDLC maintenance stage. Gate on capability tags enforced in code b
Goal: run routine maintenance for every project in the maintenance contents page.
**`MAINTAIN_CONTENTS` lives in the CONTENTS wiki repo**, the one `jsc-gitea/tools/gitea.sh wiki-repo CONTENTS` resolves: `JSC_WIKI_REPO_CONTENTS` first, `JSC_WIKI_REPO` second, exit 3 when neither is set; it **never** falls back to `JSC_WIKI_REPO_MAINTAIN`. `MAINTAIN` is the one page type with no content page, so this directory page is the whole record — read it and write it there, and nowhere else. Any link it carries to a page of another type is the absolute URL from `gitea.sh wiki-url {that type's repo} {page}`, because `[[...]]` resolves only inside one wiki. Branch on that command's exit code every time — this is the same branching `jsc-log:worklog` runs over the same call:
**`MAINTAIN_CONTENTS` lives in the CONTENTS wiki repo**, the one `jsc-gitea/tools/gitea.sh wiki-repo CONTENTS` resolves: `JSC_WIKI_REPO_CONTENTS` first, `JSC_WIKI_REPO` second, exit 3 when neither is set; it **never** falls back to `JSC_WIKI_REPO_MAINTAIN`. `MAINTAIN` is the one page type with no content page, so this directory page is the whole record — read it and write it there, and nowhere else. Every link it carries is written as `[{text}]({url})`, and the `{url}` is the absolute URL from `gitea.sh wiki-url {that type's repo} {page}` — one link syntax, whichever wiki the page sits in. The syntax and the check that runs before every write: "Every link is checked before it reaches a page" below. Branch on `wiki-url`'s exit code every time — this is the same branching `jsc-log:worklog` runs over the same call:
| Exit | What this stage does |
| --- | --- |
@@ -39,10 +39,26 @@ All wiki reads and writes go through `jsc-gitea:wiki`. **A failed wiki read or w
3. **A code comment states why the code is written this way; it never states where the work is tracked.** Issue numbers, commit hashes, branch names, people's names and `@` mentions stay out of every code comment this project's maintenance touches — including the comments the cleanup method rewrites. Full list and the allowed exceptions: `jsc-review/references/comment-scope.md`. Two passes already cover the diff, so **run no separate manual sweep of your own**: `jsc-hooks/hooks/comment-scope.sh` compares each file after it is written and prints a warning — fix the flagged line at once, then carry on — and `jsc-git:commit` sweeps the whole working tree again in step 3.4, before anything is committed. **Coverage is not the same on every CLI**: only claude gets the per-file warning as the file is written. On codex, kiro, copilot and antigravity the hook fires late — at the end of the turn on codex, at the next prompt submit on kiro, at the end of the session on copilot and antigravity — so the pre-commit sweep in step 3.4 is the only pass on all four that lands in time to keep a flagged comment out of the commit. Completion condition: every warning the hook printed is fixed, and the step 3.4 sweep reported no remaining comment line carrying an issue number, a commit hash, a branch name, a person's name or an `@` mention.
4. Commit the changes to a new branch per `jsc-git:commit`, push, then open a PR per `jsc-git:pr` back to the branch of step 3.1, passing it explicitly as the base. Completion condition: the PR exists, and you have reported it with the table format in `jsc-meta/references/pr-report.md`.
5. **One project's maintenance is one finished task — call `jsc-log:worklog` right after its PR is open.** A task is one of three things: one work package, one round of PR-comment fixes, or one standalone fix commit; this stage produces the third kind, one per project. Never let the stage end and then write a single catch-up entry, and never let a second project start before the first one's entry is saved — by then the elapsed time, the token counts and the difficulties are gone. Every entry appends to the same `LOG_{HASH}` page. Content parked earlier by `tools/stage-report.sh --pending-file` is merged into that same write and cleared only once the write succeeds; parked content is not a written log. Completion condition: this project's entry is saved on `LOG_{HASH}` before the next project's sub agent starts.
6. Update the project's last-maintained field (the zh-TW column 「前次維護時間」) in `MAINTAIN_CONTENTS` to today with `jsc-gitea/tools/wiki-contents.sh upsert MAINTAIN 1 {owner}/{repo} {row file} templates/maintain-contents.md`, never by hand-editing the page. Rebuild that project's row from the one the page already holds, change only the 「前次維護時間」 cell, and keep every other cell byte-for-byte as it was; the key is column 1, the repository name, written exactly as the row file writes it. Branch on the exit code per "Contents pages are appended, never overwritten" below. Completion condition: the script exited 0, `MAINTAIN_CONTENTS` shows today's date in 「前次維護時間」 for that project, and every other project's row is byte-for-byte unchanged.
6. Update the project's last-maintained field (the zh-TW column 「前次維護時間」) in `MAINTAIN_CONTENTS` to today with `jsc-gitea/tools/wiki-contents.sh upsert MAINTAIN 1 {owner}/{repo} {row file} templates/maintain-contents.md`, never by hand-editing the page. Rebuild that project's row from the one the page already holds, change only the 「前次維護時間」 cell, and keep every other cell byte-for-byte as it was; the key is column 1, the repository name, written exactly as the row file writes it. **A row that carries a link goes through `jsc-gitea/tools/link-check.sh` before the upsert, and is upserted only on exit 0** — see "Every link is checked before it reaches a page" below. Branch on the upsert's exit code per "Contents pages are appended, never overwritten" below. Completion condition: the script exited 0, every link in the rebuilt row was cleared by a `link-check.sh` run that exited 0, `MAINTAIN_CONTENTS` shows today's date in 「前次維護時間」 for that project, and every other project's row is byte-for-byte unchanged.
4. The main agent reports the summary: maintenance methods applied per project, PR table rows, and failure reasons. The report and all generated wiki content, commits, and PR descriptions stay Traditional Chinese per the STE100 rule. Completion condition: the summary names every project read in step 2, each with its applied methods and either a PR table row or the reason it was skipped.
5. **Stage report — the last thing this stage does, including when no project was in window, and when a wiki read or write failed.** Run `tools/stage-report.sh maintain` with one `--page TYPE:{page}` per wiki page this run wrote — that is `--page CONTENTS:MAINTAIN_CONTENTS`, under the `CONTENTS` type, because the script resolves each page's repo from the TYPE you pass and `MAINTAIN:` would resolve the wrong repo and print no URL — plus `--worklog` and `--worklog-heading` pointing at the entries step 3.5 wrote. `--pending-file {file} --log-hash {HASH}` is the fallback for a stage that stopped before any project finished: it holds the content for the next `jsc-log:worklog` run, and held content is not a written log. Rules and exit codes: `references/stage-report.md`. Exit 1 is a warning, never a block. Completion condition: the script's output is reported to the user verbatim, and every wiki page this run wrote appears in it.
## Every link is checked before it reaches a page
**One syntax.** Every link this stage writes — in the `MAINTAIN_CONTENTS` row, in a PR description, in the stage report — is written as `[{text}]({url})`. The `{url}` is the absolute URL `gitea.sh wiki-url {repo} {page}` printed, used verbatim: never assemble a wiki path by hand, and never write a link as `[[頁名]]` or `[[顯示文字|頁名]]`. That form resolves only inside the wiki it sits in, and it fails without an error — the reader sees plain text or a dead link, so a wrong link is neither noticed nor fixable.
**Checked before it is written.** Collect every link the row is about to carry, hand them all to `jsc-gitea/tools/link-check.sh` in one run — `link-check.sh {網址}...`, or the same URLs on stdin, one per line — and write only when that run exits 0. It prints one `{OK|DEAD|SKIP}<TAB>{網址}<TAB>{說明}` line per URL. The check goes through the API, never a web status code: a private repository's web URL answers 404 to a request carrying no key, so a status-code check marks live pages dead.
| Exit | What this stage does |
| --- | --- |
| 0 | every link answers — upsert the row |
| 1 | at least one link is dead — **write nothing**, and report the `DEAD` lines to the user |
| 2 | usage error: not one URL was passed — pass the links and run it again |
| 3 | the list holds a Gitea URL but `GITEA_HOST` is unset — report it as a setting to fix and run it again, and never skip the check instead |
| 7 | Gitea authentication failed (401/403) — stop and report the key problem. Never read this as exit 1: an expired key makes live pages look absent, and `MAINTAIN_CONTENTS` is the whole record of this stage, so a row rewritten on that reading loses links nothing else holds |
Completion condition: every row this stage wrote was cleared by a `link-check.sh` run that exited 0, and every non-zero code was branched on as this table says.
## Contents pages are appended, never overwritten
`MAINTAIN_CONTENTS` is a shared directory in the CONTENTS wiki repo: every row on it belongs to somebody's project, and this run reads none of those rows from anywhere else. So step 3.6 is an upsert of one row — never a whole-page overwrite, and a project this run did not maintain keeps its row untouched. `jsc-gitea/tools/wiki-contents.sh upsert` is the one way this stage does it: it resolves the CONTENTS repo, reads the whole page, replaces the row whose key column matches and appends when none matches, then writes the page back.
skills/plan/SKILL.md
+19 -3
View File
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ This skill is a **logic-only** stage: never output code, and **never modify any
`{HASH}` = the shared wiki hash for `{owner}/{repo}` used to build the `PLAN_{HASH}` page name, computed by `jsc-gitea/tools/hash-id` (see `jsc-gitea:wiki`). It prints the **full 40-character uppercase SHA-1** of its input — no truncation to 8 characters, no prefix rewrite. Never shorten it by hand: a shortened name points at a page nobody else writes to.
**The two pages this stage touches live in two different wiki repos.** The content page `PLAN_{HASH}` sits in the repo `jsc-gitea/tools/gitea.sh wiki-repo PLAN` resolves. The directory page `PLAN_CONTENTS` sits in the repo `gitea.sh wiki-repo CONTENTS` resolves — `JSC_WIKI_REPO_CONTENTS` first, `JSC_WIKI_REPO` second, exit 3 when neither is set; it **never** falls back to `JSC_WIKI_REPO_PLAN`. Because the two pages sit in different wikis, the directory row links the plan page by the absolute URL from `gitea.sh wiki-url {PLAN repo} PLAN_{HASH}`: `[[...]]` resolves only inside one wiki and would dead-link from the directory.
**The two pages this stage touches live in two different wiki repos.** The content page `PLAN_{HASH}` sits in the repo `jsc-gitea/tools/gitea.sh wiki-repo PLAN` resolves. The directory page `PLAN_CONTENTS` sits in the repo `gitea.sh wiki-repo CONTENTS` resolves — `JSC_WIKI_REPO_CONTENTS` first, `JSC_WIKI_REPO` second, exit 3 when neither is set; it **never** falls back to `JSC_WIKI_REPO_PLAN`. The directory row links the plan page by the absolute URL from `gitea.sh wiki-url {PLAN repo} PLAN_{HASH}`, written as `[{text}]({url})` — one link syntax, whichever wiki the two pages sit in. The syntax and the check that runs before every write: "Every link is checked before it reaches a page" below.
All wiki reads and writes go through `jsc-gitea:wiki`. **A failed wiki read or write stops this stage**: report which page and which operation failed, never carry on against a page you could not read, and never report a page as saved when the write failed. Step 8 still runs after such a stop.
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ All wiki reads and writes go through `jsc-gitea:wiki`. **A failed wiki read or w
Completion condition: all three items are settled under both conditions of `references/consensus.md` — no remaining unknown that would change the output, **and** the user's explicit confirmation of the summary you read back.
5. Turn the consensus into **user stories** (the zh-TW pattern 「身為⋯⋯我想要⋯⋯以便⋯⋯」), one per line. Completion condition: every consensus item is covered by at least one user story in that pattern, and no user story rests on an unanswered question.
6. Apply `templates/plan-page.md` to create or update the plan page **in the PLAN wiki repo**, and write it back via `jsc-gitea:wiki`. The page content is Traditional Chinese, exactly as the template dictates. Completion condition: the page is saved on the wiki and carries every section the template dictates — goal, scope, feasibility, user stories and the consensus summary — with no placeholder left unfilled.
6. Apply `templates/plan-page.md` to create or update the plan page **in the PLAN wiki repo**, and write it back via `jsc-gitea:wiki`. The page content is Traditional Chinese, exactly as the template dictates. **Every link on that page is written as `[{文字}]({連結})` and passes `jsc-gitea/tools/link-check.sh` before the write** — see "Every link is checked before it reaches a page" below. Completion condition: the page is saved on the wiki and carries every section the template dictates — goal, scope, feasibility, user stories and the consensus summary — with no placeholder left unfilled, and the page holds no link that the check did not clear.
7. Upsert this plan's row in `PLAN_CONTENTS` with `jsc-gitea/tools/wiki-contents.sh`; never hand-edit the directory page. **Take the plan page's absolute link from `gitea.sh wiki-url {PLAN repo} PLAN_{HASH}` first, and branch on that command's exit code before the row is built** — the same branching `jsc-log:worklog` runs over this call:
| Exit | What this step does |
@@ -39,9 +39,25 @@ All wiki reads and writes go through `jsc-gitea:wiki`. **A failed wiki read or w
| 7 | the key is invalid or lacks permission (HTTP 401/403) — stop and report the key problem. Never read this as exit 4: the plan page is alive, and treating it as absent records a live page as one that was never written |
| 8 | any other API failure — stop and report that status, and do not retry the same call unchanged |
Never let an empty string stand in for the URL: a row whose link cell is empty is a directory entry that points nowhere, and the next run overwrites it as if it were correct. Then build one file holding the single row from `templates/plan-contents.md` — the plan name, that absolute link, the code repository, the HASH, the literal 「未分析」 and the creation date; produce that file per Hard limits, with a Bash heredoc or `mktemp`, never with `Write` or `Edit`. Then run `jsc-gitea/tools/wiki-contents.sh upsert PLAN 4 {HASH} {row file} templates/plan-contents.md`. The key is the HASH column, column 4, written exactly as the row file writes it; a key typed by hand appends a second row for the same plan. Branch on the exit code per "Contents pages are appended, never overwritten" below. Completion condition: `wiki-url` returned 0 and its URL is the one in the row, the upsert exited 0, `PLAN_CONTENTS` shows this plan's row with the literal 「未分析」 and that absolute plan-page link, and you have reported both exit codes plus whether the script printed `updated` or `added`.
Never let an empty string stand in for the URL: a row whose link cell is empty is a directory entry that points nowhere, and the next run overwrites it as if it were correct. **Then check that URL with `jsc-gitea/tools/link-check.sh` and build the row only on exit 0** — see "Every link is checked before it reaches a page" below; a link that does not answer never goes into a directory everyone else reads. Then build one file holding the single row from `templates/plan-contents.md` — the plan name, that absolute link written as `[{文字}]({連結})`, the code repository, the HASH, the literal 「未分析」 and the creation date; produce that file per Hard limits, with a Bash heredoc or `mktemp`, never with `Write` or `Edit`. Then run `jsc-gitea/tools/wiki-contents.sh upsert PLAN 4 {HASH} {row file} templates/plan-contents.md`. The key is the HASH column, column 4, written exactly as the row file writes it; a key typed by hand appends a second row for the same plan. Branch on the exit code per "Contents pages are appended, never overwritten" below. Completion condition: `wiki-url` returned 0 and its URL is the one in the row, `link-check.sh` returned 0 over that URL, the upsert exited 0, `PLAN_CONTENTS` shows this plan's row with the literal 「未分析」 and that absolute plan-page link, and you have reported all three exit codes plus whether the script printed `updated` or `added`.
8. **Stage report — the last thing this stage does, including every early stop** (the model gate blocked, no plan was selectable, a wiki read or write failed). Run `tools/stage-report.sh plan` with one `--page TYPE:{page}` per wiki page this run wrote — `--page PLAN:PLAN_{HASH}` for the content page and `--page CONTENTS:PLAN_CONTENTS` for the directory page, because the script resolves each page's repo from the TYPE you pass and the two pages no longer share one — plus `--worklog` and `--worklog-heading` when a work log entry exists. No work log yet: write this stage's log content to a file — with a Bash heredoc or `mktemp` per Hard limits, never with `Write` or `Edit` — and pass `--pending-file {file} --log-hash {HASH}` so it is held for the next `jsc-log:worklog` run. Rules and exit codes: `references/stage-report.md`. Exit 1 is a warning, never a block. Completion condition: the script's output is reported to the user verbatim, and every wiki page this run wrote appears in it.
## Every link is checked before it reaches a page
**One syntax.** Every link this stage writes — on `PLAN_{HASH}`, in the `PLAN_CONTENTS` row, in the stage report — is written as `[{文字}]({連結})`. The `{連結}` is the absolute URL `jsc-gitea/tools/gitea.sh wiki-url {repo} {page}` printed, used verbatim: never assemble a wiki path by hand, and never write a link as `[[頁名]]` or `[[顯示文字|頁名]]`. That form resolves only inside the wiki it sits in, and it fails without an error — the reader sees plain text or a dead link, so a wrong link is neither noticed nor fixable.
**Checked before it is written.** Collect every link the page is about to carry, hand them all to `jsc-gitea/tools/link-check.sh` in one run — `link-check.sh {網址}...`, or the same URLs on stdin, one per line — and write the page only when that run exits 0. It prints one `{OK|DEAD|SKIP}<TAB>{網址}<TAB>{說明}` line per URL. The check goes through the API, never a web status code: a private repository's web URL answers 404 to a request carrying no key, so a status-code check marks live pages dead.
| Exit | What this stage does |
| --- | --- |
| 0 | every link answers — write the page |
| 1 | at least one link is dead — **write nothing**, and report the `DEAD` lines to the user |
| 2 | usage error: not one URL was passed — pass the links and run it again |
| 3 | the list holds a Gitea URL but `GITEA_HOST` is unset — report it as a setting to fix and run it again, and never skip the check instead |
| 7 | Gitea authentication failed (401/403) — stop and report the key problem. Never read this as exit 1: an expired key makes live pages look absent, and a page rewritten on that reading loses the links that were fine |
Completion condition: every page this stage wrote was cleared by a `link-check.sh` run that exited 0, and every non-zero code was branched on as this table says.
## Contents pages are appended, never overwritten
`PLAN_CONTENTS` is a shared directory in the CONTENTS wiki repo: every row on it belongs to somebody's plan, and this run reads none of those rows from anywhere else. So the write is an upsert of one row on top of the content just read — never a whole-page overwrite, and never a row that belongs to another plan. `jsc-gitea/tools/wiki-contents.sh upsert` is the one way this stage does it: it resolves the CONTENTS repo, reads the whole page, replaces the row whose key column matches and appends when none matches, then writes the page back.