feat(SDLC 階段): 閘門改為能力標籤程式判定,分析與實作先確認分支,交接工作包優先

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-24 16:05:18 +08:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent 8d2b715995
commit 8df6948c5c
5 changed files with 82 additions and 41 deletions
+19 -11
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
---
name: implement
description: SDLC implementation stage. Gate on the designated model (model-config) or capability tags, lock the model for the stage via sdlc-gate, claim a ready work package from ANALYZE_CONTENTS with a work ticket, then complete its TDD todos one by one, updating the wiki after every item. Ends with jsc-review code-review and an optional MAINTAIN_CONTENTS entry. Use when analysis is done and code must be written; not for planning or analysis.
description: SDLC implementation stage. Gate on capability tags enforced in code by sdlc-gate (implement requires coding, verified against the transcript's actual model id), confirm the target branch with the user before writing any file, then claim a ready work package from ANALYZE_CONTENTS with a work ticket and complete its TDD todos one by one, updating the wiki after every item. Ends with jsc-review code-review and an optional MAINTAIN_CONTENTS entry. Use when analysis is done and code must be written; not for planning or analysis.
---
# implement
@@ -10,21 +10,29 @@ All wiki reads and writes go through `jsc-gitea:wiki`.
## Steps
1. **Model gate and stage lock**:
1. Run `jsc-cli/tools/model-config.sh resolve implement` to get the required model; if it prints nothing, fall back to the capability-tag check via `jsc-cli:models` (implementation requires the coding tag).
2. If the current model is not the required model, or fails the tag check, block the flow and tell the user which model to switch to. Completion condition: the current model satisfies the gate.
3. Lock the stage: run `jsc-hooks/hooks/sdlc-gate.sh lock implement {current-model}`. From now until the next SDLC stage's gate runs, the sdlc-gate hook enforces this model on every prompt; switching models mid-stage gets blocked. Completion condition: the lock file is written, verified with `sdlc-gate.sh report`.
2. **Generate a work ticket**: format `TICKET_{yyyyMMdd}_{HHmmss}_{HASH}`. `{HASH}` = the shared wiki hash for `{owner}/{repo}`, computed by `jsc-gitea/tools/hash-id` (see `jsc-gitea:wiki`). Try to rename the current session to the ticket name (skip when the CLI does not support it).
3. Read `ANALYZE_CONTENTS` via `jsc-gitea:wiki` and list what is unfinished: plan name, HASH, work package number, count of open items. A selectable work package must satisfy all three: **unfinished, dependency-free (or all dependencies done), and not holding a work ticket**.
4. Let the user pick a work package per `jsc-ask:ask` rules (options state open-item count and estimated effort). Write the ticket into that work package's ticket column (the zh-TW field 「工作證」) on the analysis page and save it back to the wiki. **Only after the ticket is saved successfully may you proceed.**
5. List every open item of the work package and implement them **one at a time**:
1. **Model gate and stage lock** (capability tags, enforced in code — never self-assessed):
1. Run `jsc-cli/tools/model-tags.sh sync` to refresh `$JSC_HOME/model-tags.tsv` from `jsc-cli/references/model-tags.md`.
2. Run `jsc-hooks/hooks/sdlc-gate.sh lock implement`. The script reads the **actual** model id from the transcript, compares it against this stage's required tags (`coding`), and locks the stage only when they match.
3. **Never claim a capability tag you have not verified with that script**, and never substitute your own judgement for its verdict. Non-zero exit = blocked: relay the script's message verbatim, stop the skill, do nothing else this turn. Do not run `unlock` to get past the gate; only the user may decide that.
4. Exit 0 means the stage is locked. From now until the next stage's gate runs, the sdlc-gate hook blocks every prompt whose model stops satisfying the tags.
2. **Confirm the target branch** — do this **before writing any file**:
1. Report the current branch, whether the working tree is clean, and which of `origin/develop` / `origin/master` exist, plus the remote default branch resolved per `/jsc-shared:spec-git-safety`.
2. Ask per `jsc-ask:ask` rules which branch this work merges into; state the impact scope on every option (the answer decides the PR target and, when it collides with the current branch, forces a new working branch).
3. Uncommitted changes in the working tree → warn first and let the user commit or back them up; never discard them.
4. Apply `/jsc-shared:spec-git-safety` to the confirmed target: source branch and target branch sharing a name means creating a new working branch instead of committing on the target; report the resulting branch name.
5. Record the confirmed target branch on the analysis page next to the work ticket, and reuse it as the PR target in `jsc-git:pr`. Completion condition: the user has confirmed the target branch explicitly; never fall back to `develop` silently.
3. **Generate a work ticket**: format `TICKET_{yyyyMMdd}_{HHmmss}_{HASH}`. `{HASH}` = the shared wiki hash for `{owner}/{repo}`, computed by `jsc-gitea/tools/hash-id` (see `jsc-gitea:wiki`). Try to rename the current session to the ticket name (skip when the CLI does not support it).
4. Read `ANALYZE_CONTENTS` via `jsc-gitea:wiki` and list what is unfinished: plan name, HASH, work package number, count of open items. A selectable work package must satisfy all three: **unfinished, dependency-free (or all dependencies done), and not holding a work ticket**.
5. Let the user pick a work package per `jsc-ask:ask` rules (options state open-item count and estimated effort). **List handover packages (交接 `是`) first** — the analysis page ranks spec delivery ahead of implementation, so keep that order in the options. Write the ticket into that work package's ticket column (the zh-TW field 「工作證」) on the analysis page and save it back to the wiki. **Only after the ticket is saved successfully may you proceed.**
6. List every open item of the work package and implement them **one at a time**:
- Follow the TDD loop: red before green, one slice at a time; rules and anti-patterns in `references/tdd.md` (refactoring belongs to the review stage).
- After each item, flip its `[ ]` to `[x]` on the analysis page and save to the wiki before starting the next item.
6. When all items are done, call `jsc-review:code-review` and wait for the review; on failure, fix and re-review until it passes.
7. Ask per `jsc-ask:ask` rules whether to register this project for maintenance: append to `MAINTAIN_CONTENTS` with `templates/maintain-contents.md`. Required: repository `{owner}/{repo}`, maintenance method, start date. Optional: end date (NULL = maintain forever), last-maintained time.
7. When all items are done, call `jsc-review:code-review` and wait for the review; on failure, fix and re-review until it passes.
8. Ask per `jsc-ask:ask` rules whether to register this project for maintenance: append to `MAINTAIN_CONTENTS` with `templates/maintain-contents.md`. Required: repository `{owner}/{repo}`, maintenance method, start date. Optional: end date (NULL = maintain forever), last-maintained time.
## Rules
- The work ticket is a mutex: always skip work packages that already hold a ticket; never take one over.
- Never batch wiki updates across items; one item, one update.
- Sample data written into code or fixtures follows the analysis page's 資料來源 column: real data where a source exists, reasoned values labelled as inferred where none does. Never invent a value and present it as real, and never copy personal data into fixtures — keep the format, drop the identity.
- Everything the skill writes out (wiki content, commit messages, PR descriptions) stays Traditional Chinese per the STE100 rule.