plugins/sdlc
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests 1 Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat(contents): 目錄頁改為先讀回再附加

Browse Source 
目錄頁的每一列都屬於別人的計畫、工作包或存取庫。過去照範本整頁覆寫，別人的列會直接消失，而且寫入不做合併，也沒有備份。

- 五份目錄範本都寫明寫入語意：先讀回整頁，已有的列就更新，沒有才附加。
- 規劃與維護技能加上讀取結束碼分支表。只有「頁面真的不存在」才准照範本建頁；金鑰失效或 API 失敗一律停下來回報，不得當成沒有頁面。
- wiki 讀或寫失敗就停止該階段，並指出是哪一頁、哪一個動作失敗，避免把沒存成功的頁面報成已存。
- 補上寫入閘門只有 claude 擋得住的事實，其餘四支 CLI 只能靠內文約束。
- 記下工作包閘門對規劃階段降為提醒後放棄的在製品上限。
- 維護階段先整批對齊各專案再逐一交給 sub agent，專案之間互不相依。
This commit is contained in:
jiantw83
2026-08-31 11:10:30 +08:00
parent de7962a8c1
commit 39a7e17b85
7 changed files with 59 additions and 11 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
skills/plan/SKILL.md
+25 -4
View File
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Goal: create or extend the wiki plan page `PLAN_{HASH}`.
This skill is a **logic-only** stage: never output code, and **never modify any file**.
`{HASH}` = the shared wiki hash for `{owner}/{repo}` used to build the `PLAN_{HASH}` page name, computed by `jsc-gitea/tools/hash-id` (see `jsc-gitea:wiki`).
All wiki reads and writes go through `jsc-gitea:wiki`.
All wiki reads and writes go through `jsc-gitea:wiki`. **A failed wiki read or write stops this stage**: report which page and which operation failed, never carry on against a page you could not read, and never report a page as saved when the write failed. Step 8 still runs after such a stop.
## Steps
@@ -26,12 +26,33 @@ All wiki reads and writes go through `jsc-gitea:wiki`.
Completion condition: all three items are settled under both conditions of `references/consensus.md` — no remaining unknown that would change the output, **and** the user's explicit confirmation of the summary you read back.
5. Turn the consensus into **user stories** (the zh-TW pattern 「身為⋯⋯我想要⋯⋯以便⋯⋯」), one per line. Completion condition: every consensus item is covered by at least one user story in that pattern, and no user story rests on an unanswered question.
6. Apply `templates/plan-page.md` to create or update the plan page, and write it back via `jsc-gitea:wiki`. The page content is Traditional Chinese, exactly as the template dictates. Completion condition: the page is saved on the wiki and carries every section the template dictates — goal, scope, feasibility, user stories and the consensus summary — with no placeholder left unfilled.
7. If the plan page is new, add it to `PLAN_CONTENTS` using the entry format of `templates/plan-contents.md`, with status set to the literal 「未分析」. Completion condition: `PLAN_CONTENTS` shows the plan's row with the literal 「未分析」, saved on the wiki.
8. **Stage report — the last thing this stage does, including every early stop** (the model gate blocked, no plan was selectable). Run `tools/stage-report.sh plan` with one `--page PLAN:{page}` per wiki page this run wrote (`PLAN_{HASH}` and `PLAN_CONTENTS` both count), plus `--worklog` and `--worklog-heading` when a work log entry exists. No work log yet: write this stage's log content to a file and pass `--pending-file {file} --log-hash {HASH}` so it is held for the next `jsc-log:worklog` run. Rules and exit codes: `references/stage-report.md`. Exit 1 is a warning, never a block. Completion condition: the script's output is reported to the user verbatim, and every wiki page this run wrote appears in it.
7. Upsert this plan's row in `PLAN_CONTENTS` using the entry format of `templates/plan-contents.md`, with status set to the literal 「未分析」 — add the row if missing, otherwise refresh it. Read the page back first and write the whole page, per "Contents pages are appended, never overwritten" below; never overwrite it wholesale, and never touch a row belonging to another plan. Completion condition: `PLAN_CONTENTS` shows this plan's row with the literal 「未分析」, every other row is byte-for-byte unchanged, and the `wiki-get` exit code the write branched on is named.
8. **Stage report — the last thing this stage does, including every early stop** (the model gate blocked, no plan was selectable, a wiki read or write failed). Run `tools/stage-report.sh plan` with one `--page PLAN:{page}` per wiki page this run wrote (`PLAN_{HASH}` and `PLAN_CONTENTS` both count), plus `--worklog` and `--worklog-heading` when a work log entry exists. No work log yet: write this stage's log content to a file and pass `--pending-file {file} --log-hash {HASH}` so it is held for the next `jsc-log:worklog` run. Rules and exit codes: `references/stage-report.md`. Exit 1 is a warning, never a block. Completion condition: the script's output is reported to the user verbatim, and every wiki page this run wrote appears in it.
## Contents pages are appended, never overwritten
`PLAN_CONTENTS` is a shared directory: every row on it belongs to somebody's plan, and this run reads none of those rows from anywhere else. So the write is an upsert of one row on top of the content just read — add the row if missing, otherwise refresh it, then `wiki-put` the whole page. Whole-page overwrite is forbidden.
That rests entirely on reading the old page back, so branch the `wiki-get` on its exit code:
| Exit | What this step does |
| --- | --- |
| 0 | the page is there — upsert this plan's row into the content that came back, then write the whole page |
| 4 | the page really does not exist yet — this is the **only** code that permits building it from the template |
| 7 | the key is invalid or lacks permission — stop, report the code and its cause, create no page and write nothing |
| 8 | any other API failure — same as 7: stop and report, and do not retry the same call unchanged |
Why 7 and 8 abort: both mean the old content is unknown, not that the page is missing. Reading either as "not there yet" makes step 7 write a fresh template over a live directory, and every other plan's row is gone — the write carries no merge and no backup. `PLAN_{HASH}` is the opposite case: it is a content page belonging to this one plan, so step 6 rewriting it whole is correct. The distinction is the page, not the write.
Completion condition: the `PLAN_CONTENTS` write names the `wiki-get` exit code it branched on, and no page was created on any code other than 4.
## Hard limits
- Never output a code snippet.
- Never modify any file in the working directory.
- **Never modify any file in the working directory.** This limit is enforced in code where the CLI allows it: `jsc-hooks/hooks/write-guard.sh` in `stage` mode runs as a `PreToolUse` hook and blocks `Write`, `Edit` and `MultiEdit` while this stage's lock exists — the same lock state `jsc-hooks/hooks/sdlc-gate.sh lock plan` writes in step 1. **Only claude has `PreToolUse`.** Codex, copilot, antigravity and kiro never reach that hook, so on those four CLIs this line is the only thing holding the limit.
- Never skip the decision tree and assume requirements.
- Never stop questioning after one round; consensus is reached only under `references/consensus.md`, and the user says so.
## What the work package gate no longer stops here
`jsc-hooks/hooks/sdlc-gate.sh wp-check` used to block this skill outright while the repository still held an unsettled work package PR. For `plan` it is now a reminder that prints and lets the run through. The protection given up is the **work-in-progress cap**: nothing stops a new plan from starting while packages from the last one are still open, so plans can pile up faster than they are implemented. The reminder still names the unsettled package, and the same gate still blocks `analyze` and `maintain`, so the cap holds one stage later. `implement` was always waved through — that is the path that settles the open PR, and a gate that blocked it would lock itself.