plugins/meta
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat(link): 連結一律寫成 [文字](絕對網址)，寫入前先驗證連得到

Browse Source 
取消 [[頁名]] 與 [[顯示文字|頁名]] 兩種同 wiki 寫法，不再分「同存取庫」與
「跨存取庫」兩條規則。那種寫法只在自己那個 wiki 內解析，寫錯不報錯，畫面上
看起來像普通文字或死連結，巡不到也修不了。

連結寫進頁面前先過 jsc-gitea 的 link-check.sh，結束碼 0 才寫。驗證一律走 API，
不看網頁狀態碼：私有存取庫的網頁網址對未登入請求一律回 404，拿狀態碼判會把
好連結判成壞的。認證失敗回 7，與死連結的 1 分開，免得金鑰一過期就把還在的頁
整批判死。
This commit is contained in:
jiantw83
2026-09-02 14:27:18 +08:00
parent 3c9137a81d
commit 651ddb3a6f
11 changed files with 154 additions and 44 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
skills/skill-check/SKILL.md
+17 -10
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
---
name: skill-check
description: Routine compliance, script, hook, flow-efficiency, and cost-efficiency audit of the whole jsc skill set with no change request in hand. Sync every domain repo from the Gitea canonical marketplace, then run three parallel groups - lint-scripts.sh plus lint-frontmatter.sh plus check-behaviors.sh plus ste100-lint.sh plus check-wiki-rules.sh plus check-page-name.sh plus hook smoke, the guidelines.md checklist audit, and an optimization review that first reads each domain's SKILLSET_{HASH} so suggestions already applied or deferred are never re-scanned or re-asked, then covers parallelism, tool extraction, repeated interaction, redundant checks, misplaced gates, and avoidable token, sub-agent, API, scan, or interaction cost. Confirm compliance fixes and optimization suggestions before applying them, recording each decision with its date, re-check until accepted fixes pass, then open a PR per affected repo via jsc-git pr. Close by appending the round's result to every changed domain's SKILLSET_{HASH} and its SKILLSET_CONTENTS row, or to the plugins/meta page when no domain was changed. Use for periodic or on-demand skill-set checks; not for applying a change request (use skillset-update) or editing one skill (use skill-update).
description: Routine compliance, script, hook, flow-efficiency, and cost-efficiency audit of the whole jsc skill set with no change request in hand. Sync every domain repo from the Gitea canonical marketplace, then run three parallel groups - lint-scripts.sh plus lint-frontmatter.sh plus check-behaviors.sh plus ste100-lint.sh plus check-link-format.sh plus check-wiki-rules.sh plus check-page-name.sh plus hook smoke, the guidelines.md checklist audit, and an optimization review that first reads each domain's SKILLSET_{HASH} so suggestions already applied or deferred are never re-scanned or re-asked, then covers parallelism, tool extraction, repeated interaction, redundant checks, misplaced gates, and avoidable token, sub-agent, API, scan, or interaction cost. Confirm compliance fixes and optimization suggestions before applying them, recording each decision with its date, re-check until accepted fixes pass, then open a PR per affected repo via jsc-git pr. Close by appending the round's result to every changed domain's SKILLSET_{HASH} and its SKILLSET_CONTENTS row, or to the plugins/meta page when no domain was changed. Use for periodic or on-demand skill-set checks; not for applying a change request (use skillset-update) or editing one skill (use skill-update).
---
# skill-check — audit compliance, flow efficiency, and cost efficiency
@@ -19,12 +19,13 @@ Single source of guidelines: [`../../references/guidelines.md`](../../references
2. For every synced domain repo, run `tools/lint-frontmatter.sh {domain-path}`. One run per domain, and the runs go **in parallel** alongside the `lint-scripts.sh` runs. It parses the frontmatter of every `skills/*/SKILL.md` without a YAML library — paired `---` delimiters, the required `name` and `description` keys, unquoted scalars carrying a colon-space or ending in a colon, unquoted scalars opening with `&`, `*`, `!`, `|`, `>`, `%`, `@` or a backtick, and quoted scalars that never close. Route each exit code: 0 — every SKILL.md in that domain parses; 1 — the failures are printed on stderr as `{檔案}:{鍵}:{說明}`, so report every one as a compliance failure with the file and key it belongs to; 2 — usage error, the tool takes exactly one argument; 3 — nothing was scanned, because the domain path or `skills/` is missing, or `skills/` holds no `SKILL.md`. Record exit 3 as 「無 frontmatter 可掃」with the cause from stderr and carry it into the step 3 merge; exit 3 is **never** a pass. This check exists because a broken frontmatter makes Antigravity drop the whole skill with **no error message at all** — 34 skills on disk loaded as 28, and only a file-by-file comparison found it.
3. For every synced domain repo, run `tools/check-behaviors.sh {domain-path}`. One run per domain, and the runs go **in parallel** alongside the `lint-scripts.sh` runs — no domain's verdict depends on another's. It compares `references/behaviors.md` against `skills/`: section per skill, dictionary order, one table per section, five rows, no empty content cell. Route each exit code: 0 — that domain's behavior list matches; 1 — the mismatches are printed on stderr as `{檔案}:{技能名}:{說明}`, so report every one as a compliance failure with the skill it belongs to; 2 — usage error, the tool takes exactly one argument; 3 — nothing was checked, because `references/behaviors.md` is missing, `skills/` is missing, or no `SKILL.md` was found. Record exit 3 as 「無清單可查」with the cause from stderr and carry it into the step 3 merge; a domain with no behavior list is a compliance failure, and exit 3 is **never** a pass.
4. For every synced domain repo, run `tools/ste100-lint.sh {domain-path}`. One run per domain, and the runs go **in parallel** alongside the other group 1 runs. Route each exit code: 0 — every scanned file in that domain passes; 1 — the hits are printed on stdout as `{檔案}:{行號}:{類別}:{命中內容}`, so report every one as a compliance failure with the category it belongs to, after checking the two documented false-positive classes (a path or branch name holding a slash between Chinese characters, and English items listed with a slash); 2 — no scan target was given, which is a caller defect here, so fix the argument and rerun. The tool has no exit 3: an empty run returns 2 rather than a silent pass. This check lives in group 1 because the audit checklist demands 「`tools/ste100-lint.sh` 對該 domain 全綠」 for every domain — leaving it to the group 2 sub agents meant ten agents each ran it their own way, and the main agent never held one comparable verdict per domain.
5. Run the two wiki-rule checkers once each, not per domain — both judge shared rules, so a second run adds nothing:
5. For every synced domain repo, run `tools/check-link-format.sh {domain-path}`. One run per domain, and the runs go **in parallel** alongside the other group 1 runs. It reads every `*.md` of that domain and reports any link still written in the double-bracket wiki-link form, which resolves only inside one wiki and dead-links everywhere else. Route each exit code: 0 — every link in that domain is written as `[{text}]({url})`; 1 — the hits are printed on stdout as `{檔案}:{行號}:{命中內容}`, so report every one as a compliance failure; 2 — usage error, the tool takes exactly one argument; 3 — nothing was scanned, because the domain path is missing or holds no `*.md`. Record exit 3 as 「無文件可掃」with the cause from stderr; it is **never** a pass. The tool strips inline code and fenced code blocks before judging, so a document that quotes the forbidden form while explaining it, and a shell test expression inside an example, both stay clean.
6. Run the two wiki-rule checkers once each, not per domain — both judge shared rules, so a second run adds nothing:
- `jsc-gitea/tools/check-wiki-rules.sh`, which verifies wiki repo resolution and the `hash-id` rule for every page type. It takes no argument. Route each exit code: 0 — printed `OK` on stdout, every item passed; 1 — the first mismatch is printed on stderr as `{項目}: want=… got=…` and the script stops there, so report that item and rerun after the fix, because the remaining items were never reached. Those are its only two codes. Until this audit, no flow in the whole repository ever called it.
- `tools/check-page-name.sh {root}`, where `{root}` is the directory holding the domain repos — the parent directory of the paths `tools/sync-domains.sh` printed in step 1, so no extra derivation is needed. It compares the page-name pattern in its three copies: `jsc-gitea/tools/page-name.sh` (the canonical one), `jsc-hooks/hooks/comment-scope.sh` and `jsc-log/tools/worklog-pending.sh`. Route each exit code: 0 — the three agree; 1 — the mismatches are printed on stderr as `{檔案}:{說明}`, so report each one as a compliance failure, and a copy that could not be found is one of those lines; 2 — usage error, the tool takes exactly one argument; 3 — none of the three copies was found, so the root is wrong: fix it and rerun. Record exit 3 as 「什麼都沒查」; it is **never** a pass. The three copies stay separate on purpose — a hook must be self-contained and may not depend on another plugin's path at run time — so consistency is checked here instead of shared in a function.
6. For every shell script directly named by a SKILL.md, confirm the skill routes every exit code the script's header declares. `lint-scripts.sh` proves the script exists and declares its codes; this check is the other half — that the caller branches on each of them. Report evidence as `skill file:line -> script path`.
7. When the `jsc-hooks` domain is present, run `jsc-hooks/tools/wire-cli.sh smoke {cli}` for every CLI reported by `jsc-cli/tools/detect-clis.sh`; the per-CLI smokes run **in parallel**. When no CLI is detected, run `jsc-hooks/tools/wire-cli.sh smoke codex` as the minimum hook behavior check and label it 「預設 hook smoke」 in the report. Use `smoke`, not `purge` or rewiring actions, and set `JSC_READONLY=1` for the whole audit so a mistyped sub-command is refused in code (exit 6) instead of rewiring the machine; `status` and `smoke` are unaffected by that variable. Route each `smoke` exit code: 0 — the run passed its own assertions; 2 — usage error, so fix the CLI code and rerun; 4 — the smoke failed, which includes the script's own result-line count not matching what it expected. **Read the count from the script's `lines<TAB>{數量}` output line; never write the number into this skill.** The script counts its own result lines and asserts them, so a hardcoded number here goes stale the moment a hook or a decision path is added — an out-of-date count in a SKILL.md is exactly what misled the previous audit.
8. When a hook or script smoke fails, route it as a compliance failure with script name, exit code, output summary, and proposed fix. Do not continue to report the affected hook as compliant.
7. For every shell script directly named by a SKILL.md, confirm the skill routes every exit code the script's header declares. `lint-scripts.sh` proves the script exists and declares its codes; this check is the other half — that the caller branches on each of them. Report evidence as `skill file:line -> script path`.
8. When the `jsc-hooks` domain is present, run `jsc-hooks/tools/wire-cli.sh smoke {cli}` for every CLI reported by `jsc-cli/tools/detect-clis.sh`; the per-CLI smokes run **in parallel**. When no CLI is detected, run `jsc-hooks/tools/wire-cli.sh smoke codex` as the minimum hook behavior check and label it 「預設 hook smoke」 in the report. Use `smoke`, not `purge` or rewiring actions, and set `JSC_READONLY=1` for the whole audit so a mistyped sub-command is refused in code (exit 6) instead of rewiring the machine; `status` and `smoke` are unaffected by that variable. Route each `smoke` exit code: 0 — the run passed its own assertions; 2 — usage error, so fix the CLI code and rerun; 4 — the smoke failed, which includes the script's own result-line count not matching what it expected. **Read the count from the script's `lines<TAB>{數量}` output line; never write the number into this skill.** The script counts its own result lines and asserts them, so a hardcoded number here goes stale the moment a hook or a decision path is added — an out-of-date count in a SKILL.md is exactly what misled the previous audit.
9. When a hook or script smoke fails, route it as a compliance failure with script name, exit code, output summary, and proposed fix. Do not continue to report the affected hook as compliant.
**Group 2 — audit every skill of every domain against the guidelines.md audit checklist.** This group MUST run as a sub agent, one sub agent per domain repo, and those sub agents run **in parallel**. Each sub agent reports its findings: skill, failed checklist item, evidence (file:line), proposed fix. Cover the checklist's four flow checks by name, not only the naming and language items:
- Every step number, file path and section title the skill references — inside itself and in other files — really exists (the pointer points at something).
@@ -32,7 +33,7 @@ Single source of guidelines: [`../../references/guidelines.md`](../../references
- Every external call (script, API, other skill) states what to do on failure and routes every exit code.
- No gate the skill installs blocks the only path that lifts that gate.
Eight checklist items are **already decided by group 1** and must not be re-run here: `sh -n` on every `tools/` and `hooks/` script, script existence with the executable bit, the hook smoke, the `references/behaviors.md` match, the `lint-frontmatter.sh` verdict, the `ste100-lint.sh` verdict, the page-name-pattern verdict from `tools/check-page-name.sh`, and the wiki repo resolution plus `hash-id` verdict from `jsc-gitea/tools/check-wiki-rules.sh`. Tell each sub agent to skip those eight and leave them blank; the main agent fills them in from the group 1 verdicts when merging in step 3. The last two are **one verdict for the whole round**, not one per domain — group 1 runs each of those two checkers once, because both judge rules the domains share — so the merge writes that single verdict into every domain's checklist. Re-scanning the same files in every domain sub agent buys nothing — group 1 already scanned them all, with the same tools, on the same synced tree.
Nine checklist items are **already decided by group 1** and must not be re-run here: `sh -n` on every `tools/` and `hooks/` script, script existence with the executable bit, the hook smoke, the `references/behaviors.md` match, the `lint-frontmatter.sh` verdict, the `ste100-lint.sh` verdict, the link-format verdict from `tools/check-link-format.sh`, the page-name-pattern verdict from `tools/check-page-name.sh`, and the wiki repo resolution plus `hash-id` verdict from `jsc-gitea/tools/check-wiki-rules.sh`. Tell each sub agent to skip those nine and leave them blank; the main agent fills them in from the group 1 verdicts when merging in step 3. The link-checklist item has a second half no script can judge — that every link went through `jsc-gitea/tools/link-check.sh` before it was written — so each sub agent still audits that half from the skill text. The last two are **one verdict for the whole round**, not one per domain — group 1 runs each of those two checkers once, because both judge rules the domains share — so the merge writes that single verdict into every domain's checklist. Re-scanning the same files in every domain sub agent buys nothing — group 1 already scanned them all, with the same tools, on the same synced tree.
**Group 3 — a flow and cost optimization review**, kept separate from the compliance audit.
@@ -70,8 +71,8 @@ Single source of guidelines: [`../../references/guidelines.md`](../../references
Each optimization finding reports skill, aspect, evidence (file:line), current flow step count, proposed flow step count, what time or interaction it saves, what cost it saves, current cost driver, proposed cost driver, whether correctness decreases, which protection would be weakened if any, the **決議** (`套用`, `延後` or `自訂`) recorded in step 3, and the **決議日期** that decision was made. The last two fields start empty and are filled in by step 3; they are what step 8 writes to the wiki and what the next round reads back, so a finding that reaches step 8 with either field empty is unfinished, not optional. Cost savings may be token volume, sub-agent count, API calls, file scans, full-repo audits, or user prompts. Keep optimization findings separate from compliance failures.
Completion condition for all three groups: every domain has a `lint-scripts.sh` verdict, a `lint-frontmatter.sh` verdict, a `check-behaviors.sh` verdict and an `ste100-lint.sh` verdict, `check-wiki-rules.sh` and `check-page-name.sh` each have one verdict for the whole run, every script named by a SKILL.md has an exit-code-routing verdict, and every smoked CLI has a `smoke` exit code plus the `lines` value the script printed for it; every domain has a group 2 audit result that names a verdict for all checklist items — the four flow checks included, and the eight group 1 items left blank for the step 3 merge rather than re-scanned; and every one of the six aspects has returned a verdict for every domain whose settled list was read, 「無發現」 where an aspect found nothing and every settled entry of that domain excluded rather than re-reported — a domain whose pre-read failed carries 「本輪未取得已決議清單，優化建議暫不提出」 instead, and that sentence is a complete group 3 result for it.
3. Merge the three groups, then present compliance failures and optimization findings separately via the `jsc-ask:ask` decision tree. Merging means one thing in code: fill the eight skipped checklist items of every group 2 sub agent report from the matching group 1 verdicts, so each domain ends with one complete checklist and no item counted twice. Six of the eight are per-domain verdicts, one domain to one item. The other two — `check-page-name.sh` and `check-wiki-rules.sh` — are judged **once for the whole round**, and that one verdict goes into that same item of **every** domain's checklist; re-judging a whole-round item per domain is precisely the double counting this merge exists to stop. A domain that group 3 marked 「本輪未取得已決議清單，優化建議暫不提出」 still gets its full compliance checklist here; only its optimization findings are missing, and the merge report says so.
Completion condition for all three groups: every domain has a `lint-scripts.sh` verdict, a `lint-frontmatter.sh` verdict, a `check-behaviors.sh` verdict, an `ste100-lint.sh` verdict and a `check-link-format.sh` verdict, `check-wiki-rules.sh` and `check-page-name.sh` each have one verdict for the whole run, every script named by a SKILL.md has an exit-code-routing verdict, and every smoked CLI has a `smoke` exit code plus the `lines` value the script printed for it; every domain has a group 2 audit result that names a verdict for all checklist items — the four flow checks included, and the nine group 1 items left blank for the step 3 merge rather than re-scanned; and every one of the six aspects has returned a verdict for every domain whose settled list was read, 「無發現」 where an aspect found nothing and every settled entry of that domain excluded rather than re-reported — a domain whose pre-read failed carries 「本輪未取得已決議清單，優化建議暫不提出」 instead, and that sentence is a complete group 3 result for it.
3. Merge the three groups, then present compliance failures and optimization findings separately via the `jsc-ask:ask` decision tree. Merging means one thing in code: fill the nine skipped checklist items of every group 2 sub agent report from the matching group 1 verdicts, so each domain ends with one complete checklist and no item counted twice. Seven of the nine are per-domain verdicts, one domain to one item. The other two — `check-page-name.sh` and `check-wiki-rules.sh` — are judged **once for the whole round**, and that one verdict goes into that same item of **every** domain's checklist; re-judging a whole-round item per domain is precisely the double counting this merge exists to stop. A domain that group 3 marked 「本輪未取得已決議清單，優化建議暫不提出」 still gets its full compliance checklist here; only its optimization findings are missing, and the merge report says so.
- Compliance failure options: apply the proposed fix / skip / custom fix. Every option states its impact scope, for example skipping leaves the skill non-compliant until the next audit.
- Optimization options: apply / defer / custom. Record the chosen option in the finding's 決議 field as `套用`, `延後` or `自訂`, and today's date in 決議日期. Any suggestion that weakens a protection must name the protection it removes and must not be applied unless the user explicitly accepts that tradeoff. Cost optimization may move, merge, cache, or narrow checks; it must not delete a compliance check only because it is expensive.
@@ -84,7 +85,7 @@ Single source of guidelines: [`../../references/guidelines.md`](../../references
- Exit 0 — every copy holds identical bytes; the script verifies that itself.
Completion condition: the script exits 0 and prints the touched paths.
6. Re-run the group 1 script, frontmatter, behavior-list, language, wiki-rule, page-name and hook validation, re-check the guidelines.md audit checklist for every touched skill, then re-run the optimization aspect that produced each accepted optimization. These three re-runs are as independent as the first pass, so run them **in parallel** and merge them the same way step 3 did. On any compliance failure, **return to step 3**: confirm and fix again, until all accepted compliance fixes pass. On an accepted optimization that does not produce the promised step reduction or cost reduction, or still weakens correctness beyond the recorded decision, return to step 3 for a new decision. Completion condition: `tools/lint-scripts.sh` exits 0 or 3 for every domain, `tools/lint-frontmatter.sh` exits 0 for every domain — exit 3 is 「什麼都沒掃」 and never counts as a pass — `tools/check-behaviors.sh` exits 0 for every domain, `tools/ste100-lint.sh` exits 0 for every domain, `jsc-gitea/tools/check-wiki-rules.sh` exits 0, `tools/check-page-name.sh` exits 0 — its exit 3 is 「什麼都沒查」 and never counts as a pass — every hook smoke exits 0 with the `lines` count the script itself asserted, every domain's checklist passes in full — the two whole-round verdicts filled into each domain from the one run that produced them — and every accepted optimization has a matching verification result.
6. Re-run the group 1 script, frontmatter, behavior-list, language, link-format, wiki-rule, page-name and hook validation, re-check the guidelines.md audit checklist for every touched skill, then re-run the optimization aspect that produced each accepted optimization. These three re-runs are as independent as the first pass, so run them **in parallel** and merge them the same way step 3 did. On any compliance failure, **return to step 3**: confirm and fix again, until all accepted compliance fixes pass. On an accepted optimization that does not produce the promised step reduction or cost reduction, or still weakens correctness beyond the recorded decision, return to step 3 for a new decision. Completion condition: `tools/lint-scripts.sh` exits 0 or 3 for every domain, `tools/lint-frontmatter.sh` exits 0 for every domain — exit 3 is 「什麼都沒掃」 and never counts as a pass — `tools/check-behaviors.sh` exits 0 for every domain, `tools/ste100-lint.sh` exits 0 for every domain, `tools/check-link-format.sh` exits 0 for every domain — its exit 3 is 「什麼都沒掃」 and never counts as a pass — `jsc-gitea/tools/check-wiki-rules.sh` exits 0, `tools/check-page-name.sh` exits 0 — its exit 3 is 「什麼都沒查」 and never counts as a pass — every hook smoke exits 0 with the `lines` count the script itself asserted, every domain's checklist passes in full — the two whole-round verdicts filled into each domain from the one run that produced them — and every accepted optimization has a matching verification result.
7. Call `jsc-git:pr` once per affected domain repo to open a Push Request. Completion condition: every affected repo has a PR URL, and all URLs are reported in one table with the format in [`../../references/pr-report.md`](../../references/pr-report.md).
8. Write the round's result to the wiki. This step **MUST run as a sub agent**, one sub agent per affected domain repo, and those sub agents run **in parallel**: each domain writes its own page, and no page waits on another.
@@ -99,7 +100,8 @@ Single source of guidelines: [`../../references/guidelines.md`](../../references
The key column is `2`, the 存取庫 column, and the key is that domain repo's `{owner}/{repo}` written exactly as the row file writes it; the string is the same every round, so one domain keeps exactly one row. The script resolves the CONTENTS repo itself — the directory page lives there, never in the SKILLSET repo — reads the whole page, replaces the row whose key column matches, appends when none matches, and writes the page back, so every row owned by another domain stays as it was.
The 異動頁 cell holds an **absolute** URL from `gitea.sh wiki-url {SKILLSET repo} SKILLSET_{HASH}`, because the two pages sit in different wikis and `[[SKILLSET_{HASH}]]` would resolve inside the directory page's own repo. Fetch that URL only after the content page is written: **write the content page first** — a directory row naming a page whose write failed is worse than a missing row.
The 異動頁 cell is written as `[SKILLSET_{HASH}]({url})`, the URL being the **absolute** one from `gitea.sh wiki-url {SKILLSET repo} SKILLSET_{HASH}`. Every link on both pages takes that `[{text}]({url})` form — the double-bracket wiki-link form is never used, because it resolves only inside one wiki. Fetch that URL only after the content page is written: **write the content page first** — a directory row naming a page whose write failed is worse than a missing row.
- **Check the links before writing.** Hand every URL going onto the content page and into the directory row to `jsc-gitea/tools/link-check.sh` and write only when it exits 0. It verifies through the Gitea API, never a web status code: a private repo answers 404 to an unauthenticated web request, so a status-code check would call a live page dead and rewrite pages that are fine.
- **Exit codes.** Route every one of them. None of these calls may be read as success by default.
| Call | Exit | Do |
@@ -113,6 +115,11 @@ Single source of guidelines: [`../../references/guidelines.md`](../../references
| | 7 or 8 | Stop and write nothing, because a page rebuilt on top of an unread read loses every section already on it |
| `gitea.sh wiki-url` | 4 | The content page is not there, so the write above did **not** succeed. Go back and write it; put no directory row in until the page exists, because a row may not name a page that failed |
| | 5 | The API answered with no `html_url`. Stop and report it; never assemble the URL by hand from the host and the page name |
| `link-check.sh` | 0 | Every link is reachable. Write the page |
| | 1 | At least one link is dead. Write nothing, and report the `DEAD` lines it printed |
| | 2 | No URL was passed, which is a defect here. Pass the links and rerun |
| | 3 | `GITEA_HOST` is unset. Set it and rerun; never skip the check instead |
| | 7 | Gitea authentication failed. Stop and report the key problem, and never read it as a dead link |
| `wiki-contents.sh upsert` | 0 | The row is in place. Report the `updated` or `added` it printed, with the page it named |
| | 1 | The write failed, or the directory page holds no markdown table. Report `SKILLSET_CONTENTS` as not written, together with the row content |
| | 2 | An argument was rejected. Fix it and rerun; nothing was written |