chore: update ai-review findings [ai-review-bot][failure]

.gitea/ai-review/findings.json

@@ -1 +1,45 @@
-[]
+[
+  {
+    "level": "critical",
+    "role": "Maya",
+    "location": "app/comments.test.js:250",
+    "problem": "新增的 `postFindingsReview` 使用統計功能，但在測試中完全未驗證輸出內容。",
+    "suggestion": "應斷言 `reviewCalls[0].body` 確實包含了預期的 `usageSection` 資訊與統計數據。"
+  },
+  {
+    "level": "critical",
+    "role": "Maya",
+    "location": "app/findings.test.js:154",
+    "problem": "`filterFalsePositivesWithAI` 測試不足，缺乏對 `judgeFindingIsFalsePositive` 內部的獨立單元測試。",
+    "suggestion": "為內部函數 `judgeFindingIsFalsePositive` 補寫測試，單獨驗證其對不同 Verdict 值（false_positive, confirmed, 異常值）的處理邏輯。"
+  },
+  {
+    "level": "warning",
+    "role": "Maya",
+    "problem": "在 `filterFalsePositivesWithAI` 的測試中，雖然模擬了平行處理，但並未測試當多個並行裁決（Promise.all）中，部分成功、部分失敗時的結果一致性（即確保失敗者保守保留）。",
+    "suggestion": "增加測試案例：模擬其中一個 sub-agent 拋出錯誤、另一個判為誤報、第三個判為成立，驗證最終結果是否正確地保留了「失敗者」與「成立者」，且只剔除「確認誤報者」。",
+    "location": "app/findings.test.js:145",
+    "is_new": false
+  },
+  {
+    "level": "warning",
+    "role": "Maya",
+    "location": "app/findings.test.js:189",
+    "problem": "未測試 `resolveMissingLineNumbers` 當 `chatFn` 回傳無效行號時的處理。",
+    "suggestion": "補上測試案例：模擬 `chatFn` 回傳無效行號，確保其進入 fallback 邏輯。"
+  },
+  {
+    "level": "warning",
+    "role": "Maya",
+    "location": "app/resolve.test.js:21",
+    "problem": "在 `parseBotReviewComment` 的測試中，沒有驗證解析失敗時的行為。",
+    "suggestion": "補上邊界測試：輸入不完整的內容，驗證函數是否正確回傳 `null`。"
+  },
+  {
+    "level": "info",
+    "role": "Maya",
+    "location": "app/resolve.test.js:133",
+    "problem": "`judgeConversations` 的測試中，未對「AI 回傳空陣列」或「所有 Verdict 皆為空」的情境進行邊界驗證。",
+    "suggestion": "補上邊界測試，驗證該情境下是否將所有對話歸類為 `open`（保守保留）。"
+  }
+]